J.Indira v. P.Rajendran
Case brief
What is this about?
In a second appeal concerning a property dispute, the High Court allowed the appeal based on a joint compromise memo signed by the appellant and respondent, settling title rights and issue of a specific property share.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal allowed and disposed of in terms of joint compromise memo; compromise memo formed part of records; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
S.A. No.618 of 2019 and C.M.P. No.10683 of 2019
J.Indira .. Appellant/3rd Defendant
Vs. 1. P.Rajendran ... Respondents 1 /Plaintiff 2. P.Radhakrishnan 3. R.Uma ... Respondents 2 & 3/Defendants 1 & 2 4. R.Yamuna 5. Silambarasan ... Respondents 4 & 5/Defendants 4 & 5
Second Appeal filed is under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 20.11.2018 passed in A.S. No.155of 2013 on the file of I Additional City Civil Court at Chennai in reversing the judgment and decree dated 29.01.2013 passed in O.S. No.1558 of 2011 on the file of the VIII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr. T.N.Rajagopalan For Respondents : Mr. P.Siddharthan for R1 No appearance for R2 to R5
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal is listed today under the caption “For recording compromise”. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the first respondent had filed before this Court a joint memo dated nil of December 2021.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether second appeal regarding title dispute over suit property should be decided upon joint compromise.
How to handle substitution of Demand Draft in recorded compromise terms.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
J.Indira
- respondent
P.Rajendran
- respondent
P.Radhakrishnan
- respondent
R.Uma
- respondent
R.Yamuna
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court