Ramu Pillai v. Nagesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal filed by Ramu Pillai was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant's counsel was not present or ready to argue the case on the date of hearing.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. Connected civil miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A. No.515 of 2006 and C.M.P. No.10859 of 2006
Ramu Pillai ... Appellant/Plaintiff
..Vs..
Thangavel Pillai (Died) 1.Nagesh 2.Alamelu Ammal 3.Kalaimani 4.Santhi 5.Vasanthi 6.Sellambal ... Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 15.02.2005 in A.S.No.29 of 2003 on the file of the Sub Court, Kallakurichi, confirming the decree and judgment in O.S.No.911 of 1986 dated 31.12.1991 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi.
JUDGMENT
When the second appeal came up for hearing on 05.04.2022, there was no representation for the appellant and hence the Registry was directed to post this matter under the caption "for dismissal' on 06.04.2022. Even today, i.e., 06.04.2022, learned counsel for the appellant is not ready to argue the case.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramu Pillai
- respondent
Thangavel Pillai (Died) 1.Nagesh 2.Alamelu Ammal 3.Kalaimani 4.Santhi 5.Vasanthi 6.Sellambal
Coram
R. Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court