1.RAMASAMY v. 1.ETHIRAJ
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge held that the Second Appeals stand abated due to the death of a co-appellant without steps taken to implead legal heirs. Consequent closed connected miscellaneous petitions.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeals held abated; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.04.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTIC E R.HEMALATHA
S.A.NOS.1716 & 1717 OF 1999 AND C.M.P.NOS.18146 & 18147 OF 1999
- Ramasamy (Died)
- N.Kannan
- Uma
- Arumugam
- Kala
- Ellammal ... Appellants in both S.A's
(Appellants 3 to 6 brought into record as legal representatives of the deceased appellant 1 viz., Ramasamy vide Court order dated 15.02.2022 made in C.M.P.Nos.4002, 4005 & 4007 of 2021 in S.A.No.1716 of 1999)
(Appellants 3 to 6 brought into record as legal representatives of the deceased Appellant 1 viz., Ramasamy vide Court order dated 15.02.2022 made in C.M.P.Nos.3569, 3570 & 3571 of 2021 in S.A.No.1717 of 1999)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal stands due to the death of a co-appellant without impleading legal heirs.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramasamy (Died)
- petitioner
N.Kannan
- petitioner
Uma
- petitioner
Arumugam
- petitioner
Kala
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court