Saroja v. Narayanasami
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeals filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure were dismissed as they were withdrawn by the appellant with the court's permission.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.03.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.Nos. 1577 & 1578 of 2003 and CMP No.14560 of 2003 S.A. No.1577 of 2003 Saroja ... Appellant/Appellant/4th Defendant Vs. 1. Narayanasami 2. Bakiam 3. Panneerselvam 4. Govindasamy 5. Rukumani ... Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiff/ Defendant's 2, 3, 5, 6 S.A. No.1578 of 2003 Panneerselvam ... Appellant/Appellant/3rd Defendant Vs. 1. Narayanasami 2. Bakiam 3. Saroja 4. Govindasamy 5. Rukumani ... Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs/ Defendant's 2, 4, 5, 6 Common Prayer: Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying to set aside the decree and judgment dated 27.11.2002 on the file of the District Court, Perambalur, in A.S. Nos.67 of 2001 and 199 of 2002, upholding the decree and judgment dated 03.04.1995, on the file of the District Munsif, Perambalur, in O.S. No.249 of 1989.
For Appellant : Mr. T.R. Rajaraman (in both appeals) For R1 : Mr. P. Dinesh Kumar for M/s. Sarvabhauman Associates (in both appeals)
COMMON JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these Second Appeals and also filed separate memos dated 14.03.2022 in this regard.
- In view of the same, these Second Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Saroja
- appellant
Panneerselvam
- respondent
Narayanasami
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court