Santhamani v. Mohanadevi
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismissed the second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, confirming the judgment of the I Additional District Judge, Erode, without argument.
What did the court decide?
Confirmation of the judgment and decree of the I Additional District Judge, Erode, dated 14.09.2012, in A.S.No.147 of 2009.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THURSDAY THE TWENTIETH DAYOF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
S.A.No.1246 of 2013
Santhamani ... Appellant/14th Defendant
...Versus...
1.Mohanadevi ...1st Respondent/15th Defendant 2.P.Karthikeyan 3.P.Sathishkumar ...Respondents 2 & 3/Plaintiffs 2 & 3 4.Dr.Geetha 5.P.Sivakami 6.Nalini 7.Kalvikkarasi Rajamanickam 8.K.Chinnasamy 9.Pavathal 10.Vijaya Ponnusamy [Died]
11.M.R.Pichamuthu 12.John Britto Raj
13.Sabastin Kumar @ Peter Anthony @ Prahip
...Respondents 4 to 13/Defendants 1,3,4,5,7,8,9,11,12,13
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree of the Court of the I Additional District Judge, Erode, dated 14.09.2012 made in A.S.No.147 of 2009 reversing the judgment and decree of the Court of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Erode dated 12.01.2009 made in O.S.No.131 of 1999.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Santhamani
- respondent
Mohanadevi
- respondent
P.Karthikeyan
- respondent
P.Sathishkumar
- respondent
Dr.Geetha
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court