Narasiman v. Selvam Died
Case brief
What is this about?
Court disposed of a Second Appeal by recording a Joint Compromise Memo filed by the appellant and respondents, allowing the appeal as per terms of the compromise without costs.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal disposed of as per terms of Joint Compromise Memo recorded; no costs; connected petitions closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTIC E R.HEMALATHA
S.A.No.1226 of 2010 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2010 and 2 of 2012
Narasiman ...Appellant/Respondent/Defendant
Vs.
Selvam (Died) 1.S.Jeevarathinam
2.S.Ramesh
3.Ettiammal
4.Ettiammal
5.S.Priya ... 1 to 5 Respondents/Appellant/Plaintiff 6.Dr.Vidhya Thambiraj ... 6th Respondent
(R6 impeaded as party respondent vide order of Court dated 23.08.2011 made in M.P.No.1/2011 in S.A.No.1226/2010)
Coram
E.R. Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court