C. Natarajan v. Selvi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed two Second Appeals filed under Section 100 CPC as withdrawn upon the request of the appellants' counsel, who sought permission to withdraw with a refund of Court fees.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeals dismissed as withdrawn upon request; refund of Court fees directed to Registry.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.12.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
S.A.No. 1010 of 2016 And
S.A.No. 88 of 2017
S.A.No. 1010 of 2016:
- C.Natarajan
- Shenbagavalli ... Appellants/Appellants/Defendants
Vs .
Smt. Selvi ... Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff
Prayer : Plaint filed under Section 100 CPC, to pass a Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No. 16 of 2012 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Dharmapuri, dated 17.03.2015, modifying the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No. 318 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Dharmapuri, dated 12.12.2011.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
C. Natarajan
- appellant
Shenbagavalli
- respondent
Smt. Selvi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court