Habeas corpus petition filed by husband to recover wife and minor daughters who went missing. Court summoned parties, learned wife stated differences led to separation. Court found no illegal custody and closed petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.01.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
H.C.P.NO.109 OF 2022
C.L.Paranthaman
...Petitioner
Vs.
2.State represented by The Inspector of Police, Gudiyatham Town Police Station, Vellore District. ...Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the body or person of the detenues viz., Nathiya, aged about 31 years, Monisha, aged about 10 years and Sainisha, aged about 9 years and set them at liberty.
For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, Addl. Public Prosecutor
ORDER
[Made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.]
This habeas corpus petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to produce the body or person of the detenues viz., Nathiya, aged about 31 years, Monisha, aged about 10 years and Sainisha, aged about 9 years and set them at liberty.
Hence, this habeas corpus petition stands closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar
nsd
To
H.C.P.No.109 of 2022
CP(CO) RVM(10/02/2022)
C.L.Paranthaman
The Superintendent of Police, Vellore
The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Gudiyatham Town Police Station, Vellore District
P.N.PRAKASH
R.HEMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
