Allowed

Venkatesh @ Venkatesan v. State Rep by

Madras HC27 Jan 2022CRL MP/12534/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a petition to suspend the life sentence imposed on the petitioner convicted of murder, granting bail pending appeal due to incarceration duration and lack of near-future hearing. Bail was granted subject to executing a bond and appearing routinely before the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail subject to execution of bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties and appearance before the trial court periodically.

Venkatesh @ Venkatesan Vs State Rep by — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 27.01.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA

¶7

Crl.M.P.No.12534 of 2021

¶8

in Crl.A.No.607 of 2021

¶9

Venkatesh @ Venkatesan .. Petitioner/Accused

¶10

Vs.

¶11

State represented by The Inspector of Police, B-9, Saravanampatti Police Station, Coimbatore.

¶12

(Crime No.405 of 2012) .. Respondent/Complainant

¶13

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C., to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by judgment and order dated 10.02.2021 passed in S.C.No.198 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, and to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the appeal.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.S. Shankar

¶15

For Respondent: Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶16

This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by judgment and order dated 10.02.2021 passed in S.C.No.198 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, and to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the appeal.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

The petitioner, who was an accused in S.C.No.198 of 2014 before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, was convicted and sentenced as follows on 10.02.2021:

¶19

Provision under which convicted	Sentence
	Life imprisonment and fine of
Section 302 IPC	Rs.5,000/-, in default to undergo six
	months simple imprisonment.

¶20

Challenging the above conviction and sentence, the petitioner has filed Crl.A.No.607 of 2021 along with the instant miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of sentence and bail.

¶21

Heard Mr.S. Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/State.

¶22

It is the case of the prosecution that the deceased Selvaraj was the owner of a crane and the petitioner/appellant was the driver of another crane. On account of professional rivalry, it is alleged that on 19.05.2012, around 23.30 hours, the appellant is said to have attacked the deceased Selvaraj and caused his death.

¶23

The prosecution mainly relied on the evidence of P.W.1 to P.W.4 and also the extra judicial confession, Ex.P4. In paragraph No.42 of the trial court's judgment, the trial judge has accorded a finding that the testimony of P.W.1 and P.W.2 is not worthy of acceptance qua they witnessing the incident. As regards the extra judicial confession, the trial court has disbelieved the evidence of P.W.6 as P.W.6 has stated that he does not know who had recorded the extra judicial confession of the appellant.

¶24

The petitioner has raised substantial grounds in the appeal, which require detailed appraisal. Moreover, the petitioner has been in incarceration from 10.02.2021. Further, the appeal is not likely to be taken up in the near future. In such view of the matter, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is entitled to the relief of suspension of sentence and bail.

¶25

Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands allowed and the sentence of imprisonment is suspended and bail is granted to the petitioner on the following conditions:

¶26

(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-, with two sureties, of whom, one should be a blood relative, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore;

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

(ii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb

¶29

Impression in the surety bond and the trial Court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; and

¶30

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent/police

¶31

everyday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks and thereafter, the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m. until the disposal of the appeal and if he is not able to appear before the trial Court on any day, he shall make arrangements to file an application under Section 317 Cr.P.C. and shall appear before the trial Court on any other day in lieu of the date of his absence, as directed by the trial Court.

¶32

-sd/-

¶33

27/01/2022

¶34

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶35

TRUE COPY

¶36

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶37

¶38

1 THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

¶39

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶40

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, B-9, SARAVANAMPATTI POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE DISTRICT.

¶41

4 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, COIMBATORE.

¶42

+1 C.C. to M/S S.SHANKAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶43

SR.NO.1232

¶44

Order

¶45

in CRL MP.12534/2021 in CRL A.607/2021 Date :27/01/2022

¶46

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶47

RW 31/01/2022

¶48

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Venkatesh @ Venkatesan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Venkatesh @ Venkatesan v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thushyanthini Vs the Commissioner of Police

M.Mageshwari Vs the Commissioner of Police

Mini Vs the Additional Chief Secretary to Government

P.Saritha Vs the Deputy Commissioner of Police

Rajesh Kumar Singh Vs Commissioner of Police

Hemalatha Vs State Rep by