Dismissed

K.Pandurangan v. Pushpaleela Soundarapandian

Madras HC3 Mar 2022CS/375/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras recorded a joint memorandum of compromise between the plaintiff and the fifth defendant, settling claims over suit property via monetary compensation. Consequently, the court decreed the civil suit, closed connected interim applications, and granted no costs.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed in terms of compromise; Plaintiff pays up claims for Rs. 1.9 Cr + balance; Plaintiff to handover documents; Connected applications closed.

K.Pandurangan Vs Pushpaleela Soundarapandian — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF MARCH 2022

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN

¶6

C.S.No. 375 of 2021 and O.A.Nos. 840 & 841 of 2021 and A.Nos. 279 to 281 of 2022

¶7

K. Pandurangan, S/o. Late. N. Krishnasamy, 32/11, S.S. Sahib Street, Opposite to Lakshmi Theatrre, Aminjikarai, Chennai – 600 029.

¶8

... Applicant/Plaintiff (C.S.No. 375 of 2021 & O.A.Nos. 840 & 841 of 2021)

¶9

-Vs-

¶10

Mrs. Pushpaleela Soundarapandian, W/o. Late. A. Soundarapandian, Door No.3, New Colony, Tallakulam, Madurai – 625 002. Rep.by her Power Agent S. Suresh, S/o. Late. A. Soundarapandian, Old No.20, New No.25, Chokkalingam Nagar, Chennai – 600 086.

¶11

S. Suresh, S/o. Late. A. Soundarapandian, Old No.20, New No.25,

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

Chokkalingam Nagar, Chennai – 600 086.

¶14

¶15

¶16

Mrs. Sathi Thomas, W/o. John Thomas, D/o. Late. A. Soundarapandian, No.124, Johanson Avenue, Hillsborough, New Jersey – 08844, U.S.A., Rep.by her Power Agent. S.Suresh, S/o. Late. A. Soundarapandian, Old No.20, New No.25, Chokkalingam Nagar, Chennai – 600 086. 4. N. Ravindran, S/o. Late. Naganathan, No.112, Vembadi Amman Koil Street, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041. 5. M/s. Luxebuilt Homes Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Directors, Lavanya Subramaniam & M.N.Neelankantan, No.8, Luz Avenue, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004. 6. M/s. Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd., Formerly known as IL & FS Trust Co. Ltd., Rep.by its Director, Having its Branch Office at No.498, Karumuthu Centre, 3^rd Floor, South Wing, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 035. ... Respondnets/Defendants (C.S.No. 375 of 2021 & O.A.Nos. 840 & 841 of 2021)

¶17

C.S.No. 375 of 2021 -

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Civil Suit praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass a

¶19

Judgment and Decree as against the Defendants as under :-

¶20

¶21

(a) Direcing the 4^th Defendant to specifically perform his duties and

¶22

obligations arising out of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 20.04.2010 entered into between the plaintiff and the 4^th Defendant herein in respect of the suit schedule mentioned property

¶23

OR IN THE ALTERNATE

¶24

Direct division of the Schedule "A" mentioned property ino two shares by vertical division and allocate 50% of the constructed area together with 50% Undivided Share of land in Schedule "A" property, morefully described in the Plaint "B" schedule property/

¶25

b) For a declaration that the Plaintiff has an equitable charge over suit

¶26

"A" Schedule mentioned property by reason of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 20.04.2010;

¶27

c) Mandatory injunction Directing the Defendants 4 to 6 to clear all the subsisting encumbrances created over the suit Schedule "A" property by way of Mortgage, Joint Development or otherwise on a day to be fixed by the Hon'ble Court so as to enable the Plaintiff to achieve the objects of the Memorandum of Understanding entered into between the Plaintiff and the

¶28

4^th Defendant dated 20.04.2010 in respect of the suit Schedule "B" mentioned property, without any let or hindrance;

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

d) For a Declaration that the purported Mortgage Deed dated

¶31

¶32

29.01.2019 and registered as Document No. 5726 of 2019, Joint-I Saidapet,

¶33

Chennai – South created by the 4^th defendant acting through 5^th defendant in favour of the 6^th defendant in respect of Plaint "A" Schedule Property is illegal, invalid, non-est in the eyes of law and consequently not binding upon the Plaintiff in respect of his 50% UDS in the land and 50% in the total constructed area erected in Schedule "A" property, morefully described in the Plaint "B" schedule property;

¶34

e) Grant a decree for permanent injunction restraining the 6^th Defendant, its officers, agengs, servants or any other person or persons claiming through them from in any manner by taking any coercive steps for enforcement of the alleged Mortgage Deed dated 29.01.2019 and registered as Document No. 5726 of 2019 Joint-I Saidapet, Chennai – South purported to have been created by the 4^th defendant acting through the 5^th Defendant in favour of 6^th Defendant in respect of Plaint "A" Schedule mentioned property except in accordance with Memorandum of Understanding dated 20.04.2010 entered into between the Plaintiff and the 4^th Defendant in respect of Schedule "B" mentioned property forming part of Schedule "A" property.

¶35

f) Grant a decree for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants

¶36

4 to 6, their men, agents, servants or any other person or persons claiming https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ through them from in any manner encumbering, alienating or dealing with

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

¶39

the suit Schedule "A" mentioned property including the constructed area thereon morefully described in Schedule "B" property either divided or undivided either in one lot or in pieces as the case may be except in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding dated 20.04.2010 entered into with the plaintiff and the 4^th Defendant.

¶40

g) Grant such further or other reliefs.

¶41

h) Costs of the suit.

¶42

O.A.No. 840 of 2021 :-

¶43

Original Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass an order of Interim Injunction restraining the 6^th Defendant, its officers, agents, servants or any other person or persons claiming through them from in any manner by taking any coercive steps for enforcement of the alleged Mortgage Deed dated 29.01.2019 and registered as Document No.5726 of 2019 Joint-I Saidapet, Chennai – South purported to have been created by the 4^th Defendant acting through the 5^th Defendant in favour of 6^th Defendant in respect of Plaint "A" Schedule mentioned property except in accordance with Memorandum of Understanding dated 20.04.2010 entered into between the Plaintiff and the 4^th Respondent / 4^th Defendant in respect of Schedule

¶44

"B" mentioned property forming part of Schedule "A" property pending https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ disposal of the above suit.

¶45

¶46

O.A.No. 841 of 2021 :-

¶47

Original Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass an order of Interim Injunction restraining the Respondents / Defendants 4 to 6, their men, agents, servants or any other person or persons claiming through them from in any manner encumbering, alienating or dealing wih the suit Schedule "A" mentioned property including the constructed area thereon morefully described in Schedule "B" property either divided or undivided either in one lot or in pieces as the case may be pending disposal of this suit.

¶48

A.Nos. 279 to 281 of 2022 :-

¶49

M/s. Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd., Formerly known as IL & FS Trust Co. Ltd., Rep.by its Director No.498, Karumuthu Centre, 3^rd Floor, South Wing, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 035.

¶50

... Applicant / 6^th Respondent / 6^th Defendant -Vs-

¶51

K. Pandurangan, S/o. Late. N. Krishnasamy, 32/11, S.S. Sahib Street, Opposite to Lakshmi Theatrre, Aminjikarai, Chennai – 600 029.

¶52

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶53

... 1^st Respondent / 1^st Respondent / Plaintiff

¶54

¶55

Mrs. Pushpaleela Soundarapandian, W/o. Late. A. Soundarapandian, Door No.3, New Colony, Tallakulam, Madurai – 625 002. Rep.by her Power Agent S. Suresh, S/o. Late. A. Soundarapandian, Old No.20, New No.25, Chokkalingam Nagar, Chennai – 600 086. ... 2^nd Respondent / 1^st Respondent / 1^st Defendant 3. S. Suresh, S/o. Late. A. Soundarapandian, Old No.20, New No.25, Chokkalingam Nagar, Chennai – 600 086. ... 3^rd Respondent / 2^nd Respondent / 2^nd Defendant 4. Mrs. Sathi Thomas, W/o. John Thomas, D/o. Late. A. Soundarapandian, No.124, Johanson Avenue, Hillsborough, New Jersey – 08844, U.S.A., Rep.by her Power Agent. S.Suresh, S/o. Late. A. Soundarapandian, Old No.20, New No.25, Chokkalingam Nagar, Chennai – 600 086. ... 4^th Respondent / 3^rd Respondent / 3^rd Defendant 5. N. Ravindran, S/o. Late. Naganathan, No.112, Vembadi Amman Koil Street, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041. ... 5^th Respondent / 4^th Respondent / 4^th Respondent

¶56

M/s. Luxebuilt Homes Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Director, Lavanya Subramaniam No.8, Luz Avenue, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.

¶57

... 6^th Respondent / 5^th Respondent / 5^th Defendant

¶58

¶59

A.No. 279 of 2022 :-

¶60

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to strike-out the name of the Applicant / 6^th Respondent herein from the Application bearing O.A.No. 841 of 2021 in C.S.No. 375 of 2021 and to consequently direct the 1^st Respondent herein to carry out appropriate amendments.

¶61

A.No. 280 of 2022 :-

¶62

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to strike-out the name of the Applicant / 6^th Respondent herein from the Application bearing O.A.No. 840 of 2021 in C.S.No. 375 of 2021 and to consequently direct the 1^st Respondent herein to carry out appropriate amendments.

¶63

A.No. 281 of 2022 :-

¶64

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to strike-out the name of the Applicant / 6^th Defendant from the Subject Suit and to consequentially direct the 1^st Respondent / Plaintiff to carry out appropriate amendments in the Plaint.

¶65

This Civil Suit along with these Applications coming on this day before this Court of hearing in the presence of Mr.R.Thiagarajan, Advocate https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ for the plaintiff in C.S.No. 375 of 2021 and for the applicant in

¶66

¶67

O.A.Nos.840 & 841 of 2021 and for the 1^st Respondent in A.Nos. 279 to

¶68

281 of 2022 and Mr.N.S.Thanu Madhan, advocate for the 4^th Defendant in

¶69

C.S.No. 375 of 2021 and for the 4^th Respondent in O.A.Nos. 840 & 841 of 2021 and for the 5^th Respondent in A.Nos. 279 to 281 of 2022 and Mr.Anand David for M/s. AAV Partners, advocates for the 5^th Defendant in C.S.No. 375 of 2021 and for the 5^th Respondent in O.A.Nos. 840 & 841 of 2021 and for the 6^th Respondent in A.Nos. 279 to 281 of 2022 and Mr.R.Venkatraman For M/s. Tatva Legal Chennai, advocates for the 6^th Defendant in C.S.No. 375 of 2021 and for the 6^th Respondent in O.A.Nos.840 & 841 of 2021 and for the applicant in A.Nos. 279 to 281 of 2022 and upon reading the plaint and memorandum of compromise filed in C.S.No. 375 of 2021 and the Judges Summons and the Common Affidavit of K. Pandurangan, filed in O.A.Nos. 840 & 841 of 2021 and the Judges Summons and the Affidavit of Ashish Suresh Mane filed in A.Nos. 279 to 281 of 2022 and the said Memorandum of Compromise signed by the plaintiff and the 5^th Defendant and their respective advocates and the said advocates for the parties hereto praying this Court to pass a decree in terms of memorandum of compromise morefully setout in the schedule “D” hereunder and this Court doth recording the said memorandum of compromise and,

¶70

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶71

It is interms thereof ordered and decreed as follows :-

¶72

¶73

That the 5^th Defendant herein on having inspected the Original documents of title in respect of the suit property morefully set out in the Schedule hereunder is satisfied with the interest that the Plaintiff has over the suit schedule property.

¶74

That the 5^th Defendant herein, has already spent considerable amount pursuant to the Joint development Agreement and in order to secure its interest and the interest of the third party purchasrs has offered monetary compensation to the Plaintiff in lieu of his right and interest over the suit property.

¶75

That the 5^th Defendant herein, shall pay Rs.2,35,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores Thirty Five Lakhs only) in full and final settlement of all the claims of the Plaintiff as against the 5^th Defendant and the suit property and its Original documents, as the Plaintiff herein, has accepted the offer of the 5^th Defendant herein to resolve the disputes amicably and to release and relinquish all his claims and interests as against the suit property, its original documents and the 5^th Defendant.

¶76

That the amount of Rs.1,90,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore and Ninety Lakhs only) paid by the 5^th defendant in the following manner and

¶77

which was acknowledged and admitted by the plaintiff be and is hereby https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ recorded.

¶78

¶79

a. Rs.5,00,000/- (Rs. Five Lakhs only) by way of cheque bearing

¶80

number 500274 drawn on Axis Bank, Ashok Nagar Branch which has been duly cleared on 18.01.2022.

¶81

b. Rs.20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs only) by way of Bank transfer bearing UTR Ref No. - AXIC2202802773901 on 28.01.2022.

¶82

c. Rs.30,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Lakhs only) by way of Bank transfer bearing UTR Ref No. - UTIBR52022021400176003 on 14.02.2022.

¶83

d. Rs.50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lakhs only) by way of Bank transfer bearing UTR Ref No. - AXIC220479525667 on 16.02.2022.

¶84

e. Rs.85,00,000/- (Rupees Eighty Five Lakhs only) by way of Bank transfer bearing UTR Ref No. - AXIC220604808480 on 01.03.2022.

¶85

That the cheque dated 03.03.2022 bearing number 498405 drawn

¶86

on Axis Bank, Ashok Nagar Branch for a sum of Rs.45,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Five Lakhs only) tendered by the 5^th Defendant to the Plaintiff towards the balance amount payable shall be honoured and cleared on

¶87

presentation.

¶88

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶89

¶90

That the Plaintiff herein, shall handover the original documents in

¶91

respect of the suit property mentioned in Schedule C hereunder to the the 5^th Defendant on this date and shall not have any further claims or actions as against the suit property, its original documents and the 5^th Defendant.

¶92

That since the 5^th Defendant herein, has offered to settle the plaintiff's claims with monetary compensation, the 5^th Defendant herein shall be entitled to step into the shoes of the Plaintiff and proceed as against the 4^th Defendant, if so advised, for the amounts spent towards the present compromise.

¶93

That undertaking given by the plaintiff to withdraw any claim or litigation pending against the 5^th Defendant including O.S.No. 4542/2020 pending on the file of the XVII Assistant City Civil Court Chennai, in High Court of Madras and the complaint filed with TN RERA bearing letter No. TNRERA/A3/5468/2021 dated 09.09.2021 be and is hereby recorded and the plaintiff shall have no further claim whatsoever against the 5^th Defendat and the property.

¶94

That in view of the Compromise reached between the parties hereto, subject to realisation of the cheque dated 03.03.2022, the claim for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶95

charge over the suit property shall be dismissed.

¶96

¶97

That the Plaintiff herein, has given up his claim against the defendants 1 to 4 and 6.

¶98

That these O.A.Nos. 840 & 841 of 2021 and A.Nos. 279 to 281 of

¶99

2022 do stand closed.

¶100

That there shall be no costs of this suit.

¶101

SCHEDULE - A

¶102

All that piece and parcel of vacant house site, bearing Plot Nos. 3 and 4, AIBEA Nagar, in approved layout bearing L.P.D.M/D.T.P.No.75/64 dated 05.08.1964, comprised in then Survey No. 84/6 and present Survey No.84/6A1A2, present T.S.No. 23/28, Patta No. SD/167/07-08 dated 17.10.2007, admeasuring an extent of 3 Grounds and 1850 Sq.ft in Block No.34, Avvai Nagar, No.140, Thiruvanmiyur Village, Velacherry Taluk, Chennai District, and bounded on the

¶103

North by : Plot No.2 and Land belonging to G.Seth Jesudasan T.S.No. 23/29 South by : 30 Feet Wide Road and T.S.No. 23/1 East by : Plot No.5 and T.S.No. 17; and

¶104

West by : Temple and house on Canal Bank Road

¶105

and situate within the Registration Sub Registrar Joint I, Saidapet and

¶106

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶107

Registration District of Chennai – South.

¶108

¶109

SCHEDULE - B

¶110

50% Undivided Share in Schedule "A" property along with 50%

¶111

share of constructed area in the proposed project to be erected in Schedule

¶112

"A" mentioned property.

¶113

SCHEDULE – C

¶114

S.No	Date	Particulars of Document
1.	02.12.1992	Sale agreement entered into between A Soundara Pandian and the Tamil Nadu Bank Employees' Welfare Society.
2.	02.12.1992	General Power of Attorney by A.Soundara Pandian in favour of J.M.S.Nagarjunan.
3.	05.08.1995	Sale Agreement entered into between Soundara Pandian and M/s.Pal and Priya Estates and Investments India P.Ltd.,
4.	06.11.2006	Letter from R.Vivekaanantan to K. Venugopal
5.		Payment receipts
6.	10.0.2009	General Power by Mrs. Sathi Thomas in favour of S.Suresh
7.	20.04.2010	Memorandum of Understanding by K. Pandurangan and N.Ravindran.
8.	21.04.2010	General Power of Attorney by Pushpa Leela Soundara Pandian and others in favour of Pandurangan.
9.	1011.2010	Sale Agreement executed by Pushpaleela Soundara Pandian and others in favour of Pandurangan.
10.	15.11.2010	Sale Deed executed by Pushpaleela Soundara Pandian and others in favour of N. Ravindran (Pandurangan Confirming party)
11.	30.12.2010	Patta No. C.A.No. 1900/2010.

¶115

SCHEDULE – D

¶116

MEMORANDUM OF COMPROMISE

¶117

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

17.03.2022

C.S.No. 375 of 2021 and O.A.Nos. 840 & 841 of 2021 and A.Nos. 279 to 281 of 2022

¶122

DECREE :

¶123

DATED : 03.03.2022

¶124

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN

¶125

FOR APPROVAL: 31.03.2022

¶126

APPROVED ON: 31.03.2022

¶127

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶128

¶129

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶130

DATED: 03.03.2022

¶131

CORAM:

¶132

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

¶133

C.S.No375 of 2021 and A.Nos.279, 280 & 281 of 2022 &

¶134

O.A.Nos.840 & 841 of 2021

¶135

K.Pandurangan S/o, Late.N.Krishnasamy

¶136

... Plaintiff

¶137

Vs.

¶138

Pushpaleela Soundarapandian W/o, Late.A.Soundarapandian Rep. By her Power Agent S.Suresh

¶139

S/o, Late.A.Soundarapandian

¶140

S.Suresh S/o, Late.A.Soundarapandian

¶141

Sathi Thomas, D/o, Late.A.Soundarapandian Rep. By her Power Agent S.Suresh S/o, Late.A.Soundarapandian

¶142

N.Ravindran S/o, Late Naganathan

¶143

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶144

M/s.Luxebuilt Homes Pvt. Ltd, Rep. By its Directors,

¶145

¶146

Lavanya Subramaniam & M.N.Neelankantan No.8, Lus Avenue, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.

¶147

M/s.Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd., (Formerly known as IL & FS Trust Co. Ltd, Rep by its Director, Having its Branch Office at, No.498, Karumuthu Centre, 3^rd Floor, South Wing, Anna Saslai, Chennai – 600 035. ... Defendants

¶148

Prayer:

¶149

Civil Suit filed under Order IV, Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C.,1908, for a judgment and decree as against the defendants as under:

¶150

(a) Directing the 4^th defendant to specifically perform his duties and obligations arising out of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 20.04.2010 entered into between the plaintiff and the 4^th defendant herein in respect of the suit schedule mentioned property, or in the alternative,

¶151

Direct division of the Schedule “A” mentioned property into two shares by vertical division and allocate 50% of the constructed area together with 50% undivided share of land in Schedule “A” property, morefully described in

¶152

the plaint “B” schedule property.

¶153

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶154

¶155

(b) For a declaration that the plaintiff has an equitable charge over

¶156

suit “A” schedule mentioned property by reason of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 20.04.2010,

¶157

(c) Mandatory injunction directing the defendants 4 to 6 to clear all the subsisting encumbrances created over the suit schedule “A” property by way of Mortgage, Joint Development or otherwise on a day to be fixed by this Court so as to enable the plaintiff to achieve the objects of the Memorandum of Understanding entered into between the plaintiff and the 4^th defendant dated 20.04.2010 in respect of the suit schedule “B” mentioned property, without any let or hindrance,

¶158

(d) For a declaration that the purported Mortgage Deed dated 29.01.2019 and registered as Document No.5726 of 2019, joint-I Saidapet, Chennai – South created by the 4^th defendant acting through 5^th defendant in favour of the 6^th defendant in respect of plaint “A” schedule property is illegal, invalid, non-est in the eyes of law and consequently not binding upon the plaintiff in respect of his 50% UDS in the land and 50% in the total constructed area erected in Schedule “A” property morefully described in the plaint “B” schedule property,

¶159

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶160

¶161

(e) Grant a decree for permanent injunction restraining the 6^th

¶162

defendant, its officers, agents, servants or any other person or persons claiming through them from in any manner by taking any coercive steps for enforcement of the alleged Mortgage Deed dated 29.01.2019 and registered as Document No.5726 of 2019 Joint-I Saidapet, Chennai – South purported to have been created by the 4^th defendant acting through the 5^th defendant in favour of 6^th defendant in respect of Plaint “A” schedule mentioned property except in accordance with Memorandum of Understanding dated 20.04.2010 entered into between the plaintiff and the 4^th defendant in respect of schedule “B” mentioned property forming part of Schedule “A” property.

¶163

(f) Grant a decree for permanent injunction restraining the

¶164

defendants 4 to 6, their men, agents, servants or any other person or persons claiming through them from in any manner encumbering, alienating or dealing with the suit Schedule “A” mentioned property including the constructed area thereon morefully described in Schedule “B” property either divided or undivided either in one lot or in pieces as the case may be except in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding dated 20.04.2010 entered into with the plaintiff and the 4^th defendant.

¶165

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶166

(g) Grant such further or other reliefs

¶167

¶168

(h) Costs of the suit.

¶169

For Plaintiff : M/s.R.Thiagarajan For D4 : M/s.Thanu Madhan.N.S For D5 : M/s.AAV Partners Anand David For D6 : M/s.Tatva Legal Chennai

¶170

¶171

ORDER

¶172

The plaintiff has given up his claim against the defendants 1 to 4 and

¶173

Both the the plaintiff and fifth defendant entered into compromise and they filed joint memo of compromise dated 03.03.2022.

¶174

Both the plaintiff and the representative of the fifth defendant /Company, namely Mr.Sumanth Subramanian, one of the Directors of the fifth defendant/Company are present before this Court and also accepted that they have entered into a joint memo of compromise. They have signed

¶175

in the memorandum of compromise entered into between them and also signed by their respective counsel.

¶176

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶177

The terms of joint memo of compromise are recorded. The suit

¶178

¶179

is decreed in term of the joint memo of compromise. No costs. The joint

¶180

memo of compromise shall form part and parcel of the decree.

¶181

Consequently, connected applications are closed.

¶182

Sd./- P.V.J., 03.03.2022 //Certified to be true copy//

¶183

Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.

¶184

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶185

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Pandurangan v. Pushpaleela Soundarapandian

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Pandurangan v. Pushpaleela Soundarapandian

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.G. Nayagam Vs Tmt. Seethalakshmi

R.Kishore Kumar @ Guinness Kishore Vs The South Indian Film Chamber of Commerce and another

Mr.P.J.Krishnamurthy (Deceased) 1.Mrs.Kousalya and 3 others Vs Nil

C.Ramesh Babu Vs Mahalakshmi

V. Nicholas., Vs Sri. v. Anandaraj., and 3 Others

G. Swaminath Rao., Vs G.Gangaprasad Rao