Dismissed

C. Robert Bruce v. S.P. Annadalal Raju

Madras HC26 Sept 2022CRP(MD)/701/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed to strike off a suit. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the tenure period had expired and the suit had abated, rendering the petition infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous with no costs and closure of the connected miscellaneous petition.

C. Robert Bruce Vs S.P. Annadalal Raju — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRP(MD)No.701 of 2016

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 26.09.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

CRP(MD)No.701 of 2016 and CMP(MD)No.3270 of 2016

¶7

C.Robert Bruce : Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.S.P.Ananadalal Raju

¶10

2.A.Wiselin Jeyakumar

¶11

3.Dr.Ranee Florence Felix

¶12

4.D.Jenkins

¶13

5.N.David Raj

¶14

6.A.Deva Sahayam

¶15

7.T.T.Sobitharaj

¶16

8.Dr.N.Mohan Kumar

¶17

9.Y.Gnanadhas

¶18

10.A.William Thomas

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

1/4

¶21

CRP(MD)No.701 of 2016

¶22

11.S.John Sahayam

¶23

12.D.Justin Devadhasan

¶24

13.Dr.A.J.Bensam

¶25

14.D.Brite

¶26

15.Church of South India, Rep. by its Moderator, Dr.G.Devasirvatham

¶27

16.General Secretary, Church of South India, CSI Centre, No.5, Whites Road, Royapettai, Chennai – 600 014.

¶28

17.Church of South India, Kanyakumari Diocese, Rep. by its Bishop, 71-A, Dennis Street, Nagercoil – 629 001.

¶29

18.Er.S.Byju Nizeth Paaul

¶30

19.Dr.M.J.Moses

¶31

20.Dr.Muthuswamy Christhudhas : Respondents

¶32

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India Code to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.72 of 2016 on the file of the 1^st Additional District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District.

¶33

2/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Deepak

¶36

¶37

CRP(MD)No.701 of 2016

¶38

ORDER

¶39

This civil revision petition is filed by the petitioner to strike off the suit in O.S.No.72 of 2016, pending on the file of the 1^st Additional District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District.

¶40

2.Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the tenure period is over and as such, nothing survives in the suit and in this revision petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶41

3.In view of the above submission and the endorsement so made, this civil revision petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

¶42

Index : Yes / No 26.09.2022 gk

¶43

3/4

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

CRP(MD)No.701 of 2016

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

The 1^st Additional District Munsif, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District.

¶50

CRP(MD)No.701 of 2016

¶51

26.09.2022

¶52

4/4

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C. Robert Bruce v. S.P. Annadalal Raju

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C. Robert Bruce v. S.P. Annadalal Raju

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Murugan, Vs S. Ramkumari

Sathish Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Esai Selvi, Vs S.T. Karthikeyan

P.M. Selvaraj, Vs Thirumangalam Pandiyakulam Kshatriya Nadars Vidhyasala Sangam Committee

P. Chandran, Vs a. Jeyabalan

C.Balasubramanian Vs Arumugam