The Madras High Court closed two civil original applications and a connected miscellaneous petition as settled out of court upon submission that the parties had amicably resolved the matter with a payment made by the respondent.
Both the civil revision petition and civil miscellaneous petition stand closed as settled out of court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(MD)No.678 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 12.07.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
CRP(MD)No.678 of 2014 & MP(MD)No.1 of 2014 and CMP(MD)No.3596 of 2020 in CRP(MD)No.803 of 2006
S.V.Joseph Rep. by Power of Attorney Holder G.Antony
: Petitioner in CRP(MD)678/2014
& CMP(MD)3596/2020
Vs.
Hemalatha Chandran : Respondent in CRP(MD)678/2014 & CMP(MD)3596/2020
PRAYER in CRP(MD)678/2014: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the records of the impugned docket order dated 14.03.2014 made in EP.No.74 of 2011 in OS.No.88 of 2006 on the file of the Sub Court, Padmanabhapuram and set aside the same.
PRAYER in CMP(MD)3596/2020: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 1286 days in filing the petition to set aside the ex-parte order dated 06.01.2017 made in CRP(MD)No.803 of 2006.
1/4
CRP(MD)No.678 of 2014
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Janakiramulu For Respondent : Mr.J.Parekh Kumar
[in both petitions] *****
COMMON ORDER
When these applications are taken up for hearing today, learned Counsel for the petitioner and the respondent submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 12.07.2022 that the respondent has received a sum of Rs.4,50,000/-, as full quit.
2.In view of the aforesaid submission made on behalf of
the respective parties and the memo filed by the petitioner's Counsel, both the civil revision petition as well as civil miscellaneous petition stand closed, as settled out of Court. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
Index : Yes / No 12.07.2022 Internet : Yes gk
2/4
CRP(MD)No.678 of 2014
To
The Subordinate Judge, Padmanabhapuram.
3/4
CRP(MD)No.678 of 2014
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
gk
CRP(MD)No.678 of 2014 & MP(MD)No.1 of 2014 and CMP(MD)No.3596 of 2020 in CRP(MD)No.803 of 2006
12.07.2022
4/4
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S.V. Joseph Rep. by G. Antony
Hemalatha Chandran
B.Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
