Ramasamy, v. Nagajothi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court disposed of a civil revision petition challenging a status quo order granted in a partition suit. The trial court had denied an interim injunction but ordered status quo to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. The High Court found no error but directed trial court expeditions within seven months.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(MD)No.1411 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 12.07.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
CRP(MD)No.1411 of 2022 and CMP(MD)No.5860 of 2022
- 1.Ramasamy
- 2.Vasantha : Petitioners
Vs.
- 1.Nagajothi
- 2.Jeyamala
- 3.Nagaraj
- 4.Baskaran
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court erred in granting status quo instead of dismissing the interim injunction application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramasamy
- petitioner
Vasantha
- respondent
Nagajothi
- respondent
Jeyamala
- respondent
Nagaraj
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court