Jeyarani v. Pounraj
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petitions challenging orders that rejected applications to recall a witness and reopen a suit for further cross-examination, citing the petitioner's failure to produce evidence or assign valid reasons.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petitions were dismissed with no costs and connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.
What the court decided
CRP(PD)(MD)Nos.1765 & 1766 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 24.11.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
CRP(PD)(MD)Nos.1765 & 1766 of 2022 and CMP(MD) Nos.7795 & 7796 of 2022
Jeyarani
... Petitioner in both CRPs
Vs
1.Pounraj 2.Silambuselvi
... Respondents in both CRPs
Common Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal orders dated 01.08.2022 made in I.A.Nos.358 & 359 of 2022 in O.S.No.644 of 2017 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned orders dismissing applications to recall witnesses and reopen suit for further cross-examination were to be set aside by revision.
Whether the petitioner failed to assign valid reasons or produce evidence for the alleged omission of questions during witness examination.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jeyarani
- respondent
Pounraj
- respondent
Silambuselvi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court