J.Ramesh Kumar v. K.Jeyapaul Kasi
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner, a defacto complainant alleging cheating, filed a petition to cancel bail granted to the accused in the underlying appeal. The accused settled the disputed amount before the court, satisfying the condition in the bail order.
What did the court decide?
The criminal miscellaneous petition seeking cancellation of bail was closed upon recording of settlement.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL MP(MD) No.8455 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Fourth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty Two
PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI CRL MP(MD) No.8455 of 2022 and CRL OP(MD)No.17293 of 2021
J.RAMESH KUMAR ... PETITIONER/INTERVENER/INFROMANT Vs 1 K.JEYAPAUL KASI ...1st RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/ACCSUED NO.1
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
SIVAKASI EAST POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT
(CRIME NO. 148 OF 2021) ... 2nd RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to cancel the Bail granted to the R1/1st accused by this Hon`ble Court vide order dated. 22.03.2022 in Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 17293 of 2021.
Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.N.DILIP KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.JEYA KARTHIK, Advocate for on behalf of the 1st Respondent and of M/S.P.KOTTAISAMY, Government Advocate for the 2nd Respondent, the court made the following order:-
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous petition to cancel bail granted to the accused should be disposed of given the settlement of the cheated amount.
Whether an extension of time for furnishing surety pending before the High Court should be granted at this stage.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
J.RAMESH KUMAR
- respondent
K.JEYAPAUL KASI
- respondent
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court