Subbiah v. Arumugam
Case brief
What is this about?
Three-judge Civil Revision Petition challenging an interim order was closed because the underlying main Suits were disposed of prior to the hearing. No costs were awarded.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition and connected Miscellaneous Petition were closed without costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P PD(MD)No.1654 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated: 18.10.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
C.R.P(MD)No.1654 of 2019 and CMP(MD) No.8588 of 2019
- 1.Subbiah
- 2.Subbulakshmi
- 3.Sundar Raj
- 4.Murugan
- 5.Ramalakshmi
- 6.Selvi
7.Malathi
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 can be maintained when the main suit has already been disposed of.
Whether the Civil Revision Petition is closed due to the disposal of the underlying main suit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Subbiah
- petitioner
Subbulakshmi
- petitioner
Sundar Raj
- petitioner
Murugan
- petitioner
Ramalakshmi
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court