Geetha Anand v. R.Alagukumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court restored a second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. The single judge directed the appellant to file for admission and advice was given to pursue settlement.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Miscellaneous Petition to restore the dismissed Second Appeal is allowed pending admission.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Monday, the Seventeenth day of October Two Thousand and Twenty Two PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI
CMP(MD). No.1730 of 2022 in
SA(MD).No.636 of 2021
Geetha Anand,
W/o.Sriram Anand Through Her Power Agent Sindhu
... Petitioner/Appellant/Appellant/ Defendant
Vs
1 R.Alagukumar
2 S.R. Subbiah
... Respondents/Respondents/Respondents/ Plaintiff
Prayer :-
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the dismissal of the second appeal for non-prosecution should be set aside and the appeal restored on the condition that fresh hearings will not be allowed for the same.
The jurisdiction and power of this Court to condone the delay in filing the petition for restoration of the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Geetha Anand
- respondent
R.Alagukumar
- respondent
S.R. Subbiah
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court