The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed by the petitioner as withdrawn. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition after unsuccessful vacating of premises by the respondent and an endorsement was made by the petitioner's counsel.
Dismissal of the Civil Revision Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(PD)(MD)No.1516 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 28.09.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
CRP(PD)(MD)No.1516 of 2022
J.Rajkumar ... Petitioner
versus
S.Rathinavelu ... Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the learned Additional District Munsif, Madurai Town to dispose of R.C.O.P.No.3 of 2018 pending on its file, within a time stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Balarathinakumar For Respondent : Mr.G.Aravinthan
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondent herein has vacated the premises and handed over the 1/3
CRP(PD)(MD)No.1516 of 2022
possession to the petitioner and hence, the prayer sought for in the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. Therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
appearing for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs.
28.09.2022
Index : Yes / No. Internet: Yes / No. ogy To
2/3
CRP(PD)(MD)No.1516 of 2022
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy
CRP(PD)(MD)No.1516 of 2022
28.09.2022
3/3
J.Rajkumar
S.Rathinavelu
B.Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
