Remanded

B. Raja Krishnan, v. M. Radhakrishnan

Madras HC20 Sept 2022CRP(MD)/1470/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to dispose of a pending interlocutory application for temporary injunction within a specified timeline. Court directed the trial court to decide within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Principal District Munsif Court, Madurai to dispose of I.A.No.297 of 2022 on merits within three months.

B. Raja Krishnan, Vs M. Radhakrishnan — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRP(PD)(MD)No.1470 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 20.09.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CRP(PD)(MD)No.1470 of 2022

B.Raja Krishnan

... Petitioner

versus

M.Radhakrishnan

¶10

The Authorized Officer, PNP Housing Finance, No.48, Nandhini Building, 3^rd Floor, Bye Pass Road, Madurai – 10.

¶11

Karthik Nagarajan

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the Principal District Munsif Court, Madurai, to dispose of I.A.No.297 of 2022 in O.S.No.320 of 2022, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶14

For Respondents : No appearance

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

CRP(PD)(MD)No.1470 of 2022

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking a direction to the Principal District Munsif Court, Madurai, to dispose of I.A.No.297 of 2022 in O.S.No.320 of 2022, pending on its file, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court.

¶20

The petitioner herein is the tenant under the first respondent

¶21

herein. He filed a suit in O.S.No.320 of 2022 before the learned Principal District Munsif, Madurai, seeking the relief of permanent injunction, restraining the defendants, their men, agents, henchmen from disposing him from the suit property except under due process of law. He has also filed an interlocutory application in I.A.No.297 of 2022 seeking temporary injunction restraining the defendants from his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit till the disposal of the suit.

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

CRP(PD)(MD)No.1470 of 2022

¶25

It is the grievance of the petitioner that though the said

¶26

interlocutory application in I.A.No.297 of 2022 has been filed in the month of April 2022, the same is not taken up for hearing by the trial Court for the past four months. Therefore, he seeks for a direction to the trial Court for early disposal of the said interlocutory application.

¶27

Considering that the interlocutory application in I.A.No.297 of 2022 is pending for the past four months, the trial Court is directed to dispose of I.A.No.297 of 2022 in O.S.No.320 of 2022, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶28

With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is

¶29

disposed of. No costs.

20.09.2022

ogy

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

CRP(PD)(MD)No.1470 of 2022

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy

The Principal District Munsif Court, Madurai.

¶39

CRP(PD)(MD)No.1470 of 2022

¶40

20.09.2022

¶41

4/4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

B. Raja Krishnan, v. M. Radhakrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B. Raja Krishnan, v. M. Radhakrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meena.S Vs Sundar Raj

M. Sabarimala, Vs R. Veeraraghavan

Sundarraj Vs S. Meena

Poonkodi Vs a.Mariyajoseph

Joy Jacquline, Vs The Branch Manager

Govindakudi Appakudi Iyer Trust Vs V.S. Kulandaivel