O.C. Chandra Rakesh v. Jayashree
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge court closed the writ petition seeking mandamus to direct disposal of retirement and pension benefits. Counsel informed that benefits were settled or the monthly pension grievance could be approached separately. The petition stands closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.31828 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.31828 of 2017
S.Ganesan ... Petitioner
Vs.
- The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem), No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem – 636 007.
- The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem), No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem – 636 007. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue
a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2017 to disburse the retirement benefits and pension benefits to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.R.Babu
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filing to direct disposal of representation for retirement and pension benefits needs to be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Ganesan
- respondent
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem)
- respondent
The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court