Disposed
Inayathulla v. Yellamma
Madras HCCRP/2629/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner sought a mandatory writ of Mandamus for the disbursement of retirement and pension benefits. The High Court, after noting that the terminal and pensionary benefits were already settled, closed the petition without granting any specific direction or costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed; no specific relief granted; liberty given to petitioner for separate redressal of monthly pension.