Kusthri Bai v. G.v.Narayanan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 CPC due to the non-appearance of the petitioner on three consecutive hearing dates, citing non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(NPD)No.3782 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
C.R.P.(NPD)No.3782 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
1.Mrs.Kusthri Bai 2.Emayachalapathi
...Petitioners
Versus
1.G.V.Narayanan
2.R.Kannaiah
...Respondents/Defendants
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of of CPC, praying to allow the CRP by setting aside the order in E.A.No.5689/2013 in E.P.No.3291 of 2012 in O.S.No.7968 of 2011, dated 16.04.2015 on the file of the IX Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mrs.Kusthri Bai
- petitioner
Emayachalapathi
- respondent
G.V.Narayanan
- respondent
R.Kannaiah
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court