Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 filed for non-prosecution. Petitioners failed to appear on the appointed days for dismissal. The court dismissed the petition for lack of representation.
Disposal of the Civil Revision Petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(NPD)No.1503 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
C.R.P.(NPD)No.1503 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
...Petitioners
Versus
(Marie Aroul Fleury (died rep by Lrs D8 to D17)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________
Page 1 of 4
C.R.P.(NPD)No.1503 of 2015
14.Fleury Helene 15.Jegaras Marie 16.Alexandra 17.Durai 18.Balaji 19.Samdame 20.Magui 21.Jully 22.Jayanthi 23.Jeanne D Arc Marie 24.Philomene Marie Susai 25.Dhanaselvame Susai 26.Fleury Marie Therese Lilas 27.Fleury Patrick 28.Fleury Stephen 29.Fleury Melane 30.Fleury Kelvin (Respondents 27 to 30 are minors represented by their mother, Mrs.Fleury Marie Therese Lilas 31.L.Arokianathan 32.L.Sundararaj
...Respondents/Defendants
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the order dated 05.11.2014 passed in CRP.No. of 2014 in I.A.No.652 of 2011 in I.A.No.820 of 1999 in O.S.No.171 of 1980 on the file of the Court of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Pondicherry and direct the Court below to number the Review Petition and disposed the same in merits by allowing this civil revision petition.
For Petitioners :No Appearance For Respondents :R1 to R19 and R21 to R32-given up R20-Notice served
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ________Page 2 of 4
________Page 2 of 4
C.R.P.(NPD)No.1503 of 2015
O R D E R
The matter was posted for hearing on 08.04.2022, on that day there was no representation for the petitioner. In order to give an opportunity to the petitioner, the matter was adjourned and posted under the caption “for dismissal” on the 3rd week of April 2022. Today, when the matter was called by 4.00 p.m., there was no representation for the petitioner, in order to give an opportunity to the petitioner, the matter was passed over. Again, the matter was called by 4.44 p.m., again there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
22.04.2022
ub
Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order
S S.SOUNTHAR, J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ________Page 3 of 4
________Page 3 of 4
C.R.P.(NPD)No.1503 of 2015
ub
C.R.P.(NPD)No.1503 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
22.04.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ________Page 4 of 4
________Page 4 of 4
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Marie Jaya
Marie Rose Fleury
S.SouNthAr
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
