The Madras High Court, treating the order below as fair and decreetal and noting the delay of ten years, dismissed two civil revision petitions challenging the dismissal of applications to re-call a witness.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP Nos.3455 & 3456 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.12.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
CRP.No.3455 & 3456 of 2009
Kalaimagal Sabha Rep. by its Joint Receivers 1.R.Shanmugham 2.K.Natarajan 3.S.Navaneethakrishnan New.No.17 (Old No.48), North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017. ..Petitioner in both CRPs. Vs. Dominic Savio ..Respondent in both CRPs.
..Respondent in both CRPs.
Common prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order of the learned Principal District Judge, Villupuram, made in I.A.Nos.294 & 295 of 2009 in O.S.No.40 of 2004 dated 21.07.2009.
(In both the CRPs)
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Ramakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.M.V.Venkataseshan
1/3
CRP Nos.3455 & 3456 of 2009
ORDER
These civil revision petitions have been filed as against the fair and decreetal order dated 21.07.2009 passed in I.A.Nos.294 & 295 of 2009 in O.S.No.40 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram.
07.12.2022
Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes/No ata
To
The Principal District Judge, Villupuram.
2/3
CRP Nos.3455 & 3456 of 2009
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN.J,
ata
CRP.No.3455 & 3456 of 2009
07.12.2022
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court was justified in dismissing petitions to re-open and re-call a witness filed after ten years.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kalaimagal Sabha Rep. by its Joint Receivers
Dominic Savio
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
