Petitioner filed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order. Held that impugned application for condonation of delay was already disposed of; held Christian Revision Petition is infructuous and is dismissed.
No costs. No other relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.No.1995 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.12.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
C.R.P.No.1995 of 2016
P.Ravikanth
... Petitioner
Vs
T.Shannappan (since deceased)
Sarojini (since deceased)
... Respondents
Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the learned Subordinate Judge of The Nilgiris at Udhagamandalam to allow the petitioner to cross-examine RW-1 in respect of the proof affidavit filed by him or to restrict the fifth respondent
1/4
C.R.P.No.1995 of 2016
(RW1) proof affidavit only with regard to facts concerning to the Section 5 of Limitation Act application alone.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajmakesh For R3 to R8 : Mr.S.Kingston Jerold For R1, R2 and R10 : Notice served
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the application for condone delay itself has been disposed of and therefore nothing survives for further adjudication in this Civil Revision Petition.
the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
06.12.2022
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No
Lpp
2/4
C.R.P.No.1995 of 2016
To
3/4
C.R.P.No.1995 of 2016
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
Lpp
C.R.P.No.1995 of 2016
06.12.2022
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition praying for permission to cross-examine is maintainable when the underlying application for condonation of delay has been disposed of.
P.Ravikanth
T.Shannappan
K.Palanisamy
S.Subramani
Gowri
S.Venugopal
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
