Disposed

Chairman Board of Trustees v. Govindaswamy

Madras HC26 Sept 2022CRP/2215/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of a Civil Revision Petition challenging an injunction order in a suit regarding shop auctions. The Court directed the trial court to dispose of the suit within three months, directing both parties to adduce evidence regarding the auction.

What did the court decide?

Directed trial court to dispose of the suit within three months and parties to adduce evidence on shops and auction.

Chairman Board of Trustees Vs Govindaswamy — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

C.R.P. No.2215 of 2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 26.09.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶6

C.R.P.No.2215 of 2017

¶7

and

¶8

C.M.P.Nos. 10548 & 10549 of 2017

¶9

Chairman,

¶10

Board of Trustees, A/m. Angalamman Thirukkoil

¶11

Asst. Commissioner/Executive Officer,

¶12

A/m. Angalamman Thirukkoil,

¶13

... Petitioners

¶14

Vs.

¶15

Govindaswamy, S/o. Murugesa Gounder

¶16

Shankar, S/o. Narayanasamy Gounder

¶17

The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Department, Villupuram.

¶18

1/5

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

C.R.P. No.2215 of 2017

¶21

The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

¶22

The Tahsildar, Melmalayanur Taluk, Melmalayanur, Villupuram Dt. ... Respondents

¶23

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Art. 227 of Constitution of

¶24

India, praying to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.668 of 2016 on the file of

¶25

Addl. District Munsif, Gingee.

¶26

For Petitioners : Mr.C.Umashankar for Mr.M.Selvam For Respondents : Mr.V.R.Apaswamee, for R1 & R2 Mr.B.Tamilnidhi Addl. Govt. Pleader for R3 to R5

¶27

O R D E R

¶28

The revision petitioners are the defendants 1 and 2 in the suit in O.S.No. 668 of 2016 on the file of learned Addl. District Munsif Court, Gingee filed by the respondents 1 and 2/plaintiffs for the relief of permanent injunction and other consequential relief.

¶29

2/5

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

C.R.P. No.2215 of 2017

¶32

Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, there is no representation on the side of petitioners. The learned counsel for

¶33

respondents 1 and 2 appeared and submitted that the issue involved in the suit is with regard to auctioning of shops as per tender notice dated 27.09.2006 and now the suit is riped for trial, in which, the plaintiffs filed an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 in I.A.No. 1519 of 2016, seeking for injunction. Considering submissions of both sides, the trial court allowed the application by granting injunction in favour of plaintiffs. Challenging the impugned order passed in the said application, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the defendants 1 and 2.

¶34

On seeing the facts and on considering the relief claimed in the suit

¶35

in respect of tender dated 27.09.2006, this Court is inclined to direct the trial court to dispose the suit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. However, the learned counsel for revision petitioners submitted that already shops were auctioned inspite of impugned order and now the suit is riped for trial. Therefore, both parties are directed to adduce their evidence in respect of shops as well as auction notification

¶36

3/5

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

C.R.P. No.2215 of 2017

¶39

before the trial court. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction directing the trial court to dispose the case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order without considering the merits of application. No costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶40

26.09.2022

¶41

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶42

Speaking/Non-speaking order rpp

¶43

¶44

Addl. District Munsif, Gingee.

¶45

The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Department, Villupuram.

¶46

The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

¶47

The Tahsildar, Melmalayanur Taluk, Melmalayanur, Villupuram Dt.

¶48

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶49

4/5

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

C.R.P. No.2215 of 2017

¶52

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

¶53

rpp

¶54

C.R.P.No.2215 of 2017

¶55

26.09.2022

¶56

5/5

¶57

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Chairman Board of Trustees v. Govindaswamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chairman Board of Trustees v. Govindaswamy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L.N. Madhan Guru Vs M.S. Jamal Mohideen (Died)

M/S.Swarna Constructions Vs P.L.Subramanian

Manipillai @ Govindassamy Vs Selladurai

B.Premkanth Vs v.Jenifer Salomi

K.R.Muthuganesan Vs J.Shyamalal Joshi

T.R.Govindan Vs K.Ganesan