Dismissed

Manipillai @ Govindassamy v. Selladurai

Madras HC21 Sept 2022CRP/4121/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court issued a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to select the petitioner under a quota of widow for an Anganvadi Paniyalar position. The petition was dismissed as infructuous since the selection process was complete and another candidate was appointed.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to the appointment of another candidate.

Manipillai @ Govindassamy Vs Selladurai — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.No.26295 of 2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 26.09.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.26295 of 2017 and W.M.P.Nos.27953 & 27954 of 2017

Sheela

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Vellore District, Vellore. 2.The Child Development Project Officer, Child Development Project Office, Kaveripakkam Zone, Kaveripakkam, Vellore District.

¶10

3.Nithya ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents as per the interview letter dated 05.9.2017 in Na.Ka. No.135/2017 to give priority under the quota of widow and select the petitioner as Anganvadi Paniyalar under the quota of widow at Kaverippakkam Zone, Ayyampettai Cherri Village, Vellore District and to consider the petitioner's representation dated 25.9.2017.

¶12

1/4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.No.26295 of 2017

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Pavendhan For Respondents : Mr.V.Arun Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.T.Venkatesh Kumar Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2

¶16

Mr.C.Chokkalingam for R3

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This writ petition is filed to questioning the validity of the interview call letter. Subsequently, the process of selection was completed and one Smt.Nithya has been appointed. Therefore, this writ petition has become infructous.

¶19

2.Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶20

26.09.2022 Index : Yes (1/2) Internet : Yes Speaking order/Non-Speaking order ssr

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.No.26295 of 2017

¶24

¶25

1.The District Collector, Vellore District, Vellore.

¶26

2.The Child Development Project Officer, Child Development Project Office, Kaveripakkam Zone, Kaveripakkam, Vellore District.

¶27

3/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.No.26295 of 2017

¶30

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

¶31

ssr

¶32

W.P.No.26295 of 2017 and W.M.P.Nos.27953 & 27954 of 2017

26.09.2022

(1/2)

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Manipillai @ Govindassamy v. Selladurai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manipillai @ Govindassamy v. Selladurai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The District Collector Vs Pakkiriammal

N.Ravichandran Vs Manonmani

D.Subathra Devi Vs S.Padmavathi

L.N. Madhan Guru Vs M.S. Jamal Mohideen (Died)

M/S.Swarna Constructions Vs P.L.Subramanian

Abdul Aziz Vs Mohammed Anwar