Kumarasamy v. Jothimani
Case brief
What is this about?
A revision petition was dismissed regarding an order denying appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to verify compliance with a decree in a civil suit concerning water channels.
What the court decided
C.R.P. (NPD) No.2082 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
C.R.P. (NPD) No.2082 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.13452 of 2019
Kumarasamy
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1.Jothimani 2.Ramanathan
.. Respondents
Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal orders passed by the I Additional District Munsif, Erode, dated 08.04.2019, in E.A.No.101 of 2018 in E.P.R.No.40 of 2017 in O.S.No.1534 of 2004.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Manokaran For Respondents : Mr.M.Karthik O R D E R
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner was permissible to ascertain if the decree could be avoided on the basis of a plea negatived by the trial court.
Whether the lower court correctly dismissed the petition for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kumarasamy
- respondent
Jothimani Ramanathan
Coram
S.S. SUNDAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court