A.Karunakaran v. a.Kanniappan
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant sought permission to withdraw an appeal suit filed under the CPC. The court recorded the submission and the letter to the Registry, dismissing the appeal suit as withdrawn without costs.
What did the court decide?
The Appeal Suit stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
AS.No.540/2019
[Hybrid Mode]
A.Karunakaran S/o(L).Arumugam
.. Appellant / Defendant
Vs.
A.Kanniyappan S/o(L).Arumugam .. Respondent / Plaintiff
Prayer:- Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of CPC against the preliminary decree and judgment dated 16.07.2018 passed in OS.No.2527/2016 by the learned XVIII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
JUDGMENT
- (1)Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Appeal Suit and has also circulated a letter dated 28.01.2022 to the Registry to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.Karunakaran
- respondent
A.Kanniyappan
Coram
S.S. Sundar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court