The High Court of Madras dismissed a Criminal Revision Case as infructuous because the petitioner had already completed his period of detention and been released, rendering the petition for setting aside the detention order without merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.01.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTIC E A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.R.C.No.901 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.No.12549 of 2021
Manigandan
…Petitioner
Vs.
The Inspector of Police (L&O), S-14, Peerkankaranai Police station, Chennai – 600 063
...Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Revision cases filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C to call for the records on the file of the Executive Magistrate cum Deputy Commissioner of Police, St. Thomas Mount District, in M.P.No.05 of 2021 in Na.Ka.En.05/Nir.Se.Nadu.Ka.Dhu.Aa.Pa.Tho.Ma/2021 dated 18.06.2021 and set aside the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Magesh -No Appearance
For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran for R1 & R2
Learned Government Advocate (crl.side)
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner.
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
shk
To
1.The state Executive Magistrate Cum Deputy Commissioner of Police, St.Thomas Mount District.
Chennai – 600 063.
Copy To:
The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court, Madras.
Crl.R.C.No.901 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.No.12549 of 2021
BP(CO) SB(23/02/2022)
Manigandan
The Executive Magistrate Cum Deputy Commissioner of Police, St.Thomas Mount District
State rep by, The Inspector of Police (L&O), S-14, Peerkankaranai Police station, Chennai
E.A.D. Jagadish Chandira
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
