sale deed was executed and registered vide Document No.1474 of 2016 in favour of the said Jeyalakshmi and Balamurali on 29.08.2016 in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.14/2B2A admeasuring 3.40 acres out of which an extent of 1.70 acres land belonged to the second respondent. Further, alleged that within a period of one year, the said Jeyalakshmi and Balamurali demanded refund of the said amount together with interest to the tune of Rs.1.70 crores. In order to settle the loan amount, the second respondent approached the first petitioner and he also agreed to execute another deed and availed loan to the tune of Rs.1.70 crores. In the said arrangement, the said Jeyalakshmi and Balamurali had executed reconveyance sale deed in favour of the third petitioner vide Document No.1386 of 2017, dated 22.09.2017. Further, the second respondent also availed loan to the tune of Rs.30 lakhs from the first petitioner for which the second respondent executed another sale deed in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.120/3 to an extent of 65 cents, Survey No.9/2A to an extent of 1A 19 cents, Survey No.10/1 to an extent of 77 cents, Survey No.10/5B 1B to an extent of 33 cents, Survey No.11/1 to an extent of 94 cents, Survey No.12/1 to an extent of 77 cents and Survey No.16/1A to an extent of 87 cents totally 5 acres 27 cents by the registered sale deed, dated 23.01.2017. Further, alleged that the sister's son of the second respondent borrowed another sum of Rs.60 lakhs from the first petitioner and he executed separate sale deed in respect of the some other property belonged to him. In turn, the third petitioner executed settlement deed in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.14/ 2B2A in favour of the second petitioner vide Document No.713 of 2020, dated 11.05.2020.
