Allowed

Thilagar v. Nagalakshmi

Madras HC6 Apr 2022CRL MP(MD)/379/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order condones a 356-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision Petition against an inferior court order. The court was satisfied with the reasons in the affidavit and condoned the delay conditionally, requiring payment of ₹1 lakh costs to the respondent.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 356 days condoned on condition that petitioner pays Rs. 1,00,000/- towards costs to the respondent by 28.04.2022, failing which the petition is automatically dismissed.

Thilagar Vs Nagalakshmi — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.379 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Wednesday, the Sixth day of April Two Thousand and Twenty Two

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶7

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.379 of 2022 in Crl.R.C.(MD) SR.No.377 of 2022

¶8

THILAGAR ... PETITIONER / PETITIONER

¶9

¶10

NAGALAKSHMI ... RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT

¶11

Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to condone delay of 356 days in preferring the above Criminal Revision Petition against the order dated 27/3/2019 made in Crl.A.No.147/2018 on the file of the Court of Session, Tiruchirappalli Division, Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruchirappalli confirming the order dated 6.8.2018 made in D.V.C.No.2 of 2018 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Manaparai.

¶12

Prayer in Crl.R.C.(MD) SR.No.377 of 2022:

¶13

To call for the records relating to the order dated 27.03.2019 made in Crl.A.No.147 of 2018 on the file of the Court of Session, Trichirappalli Division, Principal Sessions Judge, Trichirappalli confirming the order dated 6.8.2018 made in D.V.C.No.2 of 2018 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Manaparai and to set aside the same.

¶14

Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.V.SASIKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.A.JOEL PAUL ANTONY, Advocate for the respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶15

The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 356 days in filing the revision petition against the order dated 27.03.2019 made in Crl.A.No.147 of 2018 on the file of the Court of Session, Trichirappalli Division, Principal Sessions Judge, Trichirappalli, confirming the order, dated 06.08.2018 made in D.V.C.No.2 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Magistrate, Manaparai.

¶16

1/2

¶17

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.379 of 2022

¶18

2.Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶19

3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition and in the interest of justice, this petition is ordered and delay is condoned on condition that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) towards costs by way of Demand Draft to the respondent directly on or before 28.04.2022, failing which, this petition shall stand automatically dismissed.

sd/-

06/04/2022

/ TRUE COPY /

07/04/2022

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶25

¶26

1 THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, TRICHY DIVISION, TRICHY.

¶27

2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAPARAI.

¶28

3 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶29

ORDER

¶30

¶31

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.379 of 2022 in

¶32

Crl.R.C.(MD) SR.No.377 of 2022

¶33

Date :06/04/2022 MGA

¶34

MK/VR/SAR.IV/07.04.2022/2P/4C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

2/2

Thilagar v. Nagalakshmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thilagar v. Nagalakshmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mathew K. Cherian Vs The Inspector of Police

V.Mathivanan Vs R.Jegatha

Selvakumar Vs The Superintendent of Police

Guruvareddy Vs The Inspector of Police

J.John Kennedy Vs Samuel Jebakumar

Pradeep Vs The Inspector of Police