Allowed

A.Thuvarampathy v. C.Navaneetha Krishnan

Madras HC7 Oct 2022CRL OP(MD)/18046/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

, the Single Judge of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court quashed the impugned return docket order passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, on the condition that the petitioner deposits Rs. 3,00,000 and cooperates in the trial.

What did the court decide?

The impugned return docket order was set aside and the petitioner was allowed to deposit Rs. 3,00,000 and cooperate in the trial.

A.Thuvarampathy Vs C.Navaneetha Krishnan — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.17965 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 07/10/2022

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.18046 of 2022 and Crl.M.P(MD)No.12039 of 2022

¶8

A.Thuvarampathy ... Petitioner/Sole accused

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.C.Navaneetha Krishnan ... 1^st Respondent/Complainant

¶11

2.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Public Prosecutor Tirunelveli. ... 2^nd Respondent/3^rd party

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Poorna Chandran

¶13

For R2 : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan Additional Public Prosecutor

¶14

PRAYER :-Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.,

¶15

praying to set aside the return docket order passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli in un-numbered Crl.M.P.No. Of 2021 in Crl.M.P.SR.No.3252 dated 23.04.2022 and 1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

CRL OP(MD). No.17965 of 2022

¶18

consequently, extend the time for complying the order passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli in Crl.M.P.No. 7071 of 2021 dated 28.10.2021.

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to set aside the return docket order passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli in un-numbered Crl.M.P.No. Of 2021 in Crl.M.P.SR.No. 3252 dated 23.04.2022 and consequently, extend the time for complying the order passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli in Crl.M.P.No.7071 of 2021 dated 28.10.2021.

¶21

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the second respondent.

¶22

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.3,00,000/-(Rupees Three Lakhs only) as the condition imposed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli in Crl.M.P.No.7071 of 2021.

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

CRL OP(MD). No.17965 of 2022

¶26

4.The facts reveal that the petitioner is facing criminal prosecution

¶27

for an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

¶28

5.Consideration the fact that the petitioner has come forward to comply with the conditional order imposed by the Sessions Court and in order to give a fair opportunity to the petitioner, this Court is inclined to set aside the impugned order passed by the Sessions Court.

¶29

6.Accordingly, the criminal original petition is allowed on condition that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- to the credit of STC No.182 of 2019 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and also cooperate for trial. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶30

07.10.2022

¶31

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Ns/sn

¶32

3/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

CRL OP(MD). No.17965 of 2022

¶35

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J

¶36

Ns/Sn

¶37

¶38

The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli.

¶39

2.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Public Prosecutor Tirunelveli.

¶40

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶41

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.18046 of 2022

¶42

Date : 07/10/2022

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

4/4

A.Thuvarampathy v. C.Navaneetha Krishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Thuvarampathy v. C.Navaneetha Krishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishnasamy Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Mohamed Farook Vs The Inspector of Police

M.Rajendra Pandian Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Vinayagam Vs The Inspector of Police

Ottakaran Vs The Inspector of Police

Gokulakannan Vs The Inspector of Police