Allowed

Gokulakannan v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC7 Oct 2022CRL OP(MD)/15730/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. apprehending arrest for theft-related offences. Considering recovery of stolen property and release of co-accused, the court granted bail surrenderable within 15 days with specific conditions including furnishing a bond, reporting weekly, and non-tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to be surrendered before Judicial Magistrate-II, Madurai within 15 days, subject to execution of a bond along with two sureties, weekly reporting, and other specific conditio

Gokulakannan Vs The Inspector of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.15730 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07/10/2022 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL OP(MD). No.15730 of 2022

¶3

Gokulakannan ... Petitioner/Rank not known Vs State rep., by The Inspector of Police, Silaiman Police Station, Madurai District. Crime No.205 of 2022 ... Respondent/Complainant

¶4

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Poornachandran Advocate.

¶5

For Respondent : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶6

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶7

PRAYER :-

¶8

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.205 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police.

¶9

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶10

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 392 IPC, in Crime No.205 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶11

The case of the prosecution is that on 21.06.2022, at about 05.15. p.m., when the petitioner and the defacto complainant were heading to Madurai from the complainant's house through his two wheeler, the accused persons threatened the complainant and took away 4 sovereigns gold chain and mobile phone at knife point. Hence the complaint.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is relative of the complainant and he went to the police station along with the complainant for lodging the complaint. He further submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the co-accused were also released.

¶13

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the petitioner has been arrayed as Accused No.4 and the stolen property https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis has been recovered.

¶14

1/3

¶15

CRL OP(MD). No.15730 of 2022

¶16

Considering the fact that the stolen property has been recovered and also the fact that the co-accused were released, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶17

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Madurai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

¶18

(a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

¶19

(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police

¶20

once in a week i.e., on every Wednesday at 10.30 a.m. , for a period of six weeks, and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

¶21

¶22

(d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶23

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

¶24

(f) if the accused / petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/-

07/10/2022

/ TRUE COPY /

/10/2022

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶30

vsm/abr

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

2/3

¶33

CRL OP(MD). No.15730 of 2022

¶34

¶35

1.The Judicial Magistrate-II, Madurai.

¶36

-do-Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai.

¶37

3.The Inspector of Police, Silaiman Police Station, Madurai District.

¶38

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶39

+1 CC to M/s.S.POORNACHANDRAN, Advocate ( SR-11109[I] dated 10/10/2022 )

¶40

ORDER

¶41

¶42

CRL OP(MD) No.15730 of 2022 Date :07/10/2022

¶43

RD/TR/SAR-II(11/10/2022) 3P 6C

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

3/3

Gokulakannan v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gokulakannan v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishnasamy Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Mohamed Farook Vs The Inspector of Police

M.Rajendra Pandian Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

A.Thuvarampathy Vs C.Navaneetha Krishnan

Vinayagam Vs The Inspector of Police

Ottakaran Vs The Inspector of Police