Allowed

K.K. Karthick Kumar @ Karthick v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC5 Oct 2022CRL OP(MD)/17956/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for Crime No.507 of 2022 involving IPC offenses. The Madurai Bench granted bail to facilitate the petitioner performing last rites after his mother's death, without calling for sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail to facilitate performing last rites of the deceased mother; no order for sureties.

K.K. Karthick Kumar @ Karthick Vs The Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRL OP(MD).No.17956 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 05.10.2022

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶7

CRL OP(MD).No.17956 of 2022

¶8

K.K.Karthick Kumar @ Karthick ... Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶9

¶10

State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Theppakulam Police Station, Madurai City. (Crime No.507 of 2022) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.K.Sathish Kumar Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan Additional Public Prosecutor

¶11

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

¶12

PRAYER :-

¶13

For Bail in Crime No.507 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This bail petition is moved under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. urgently on the ground that the petitioner's mother viz., K.K.Nirmala died on 04.10.2022 at 6.00 p.m. The case was registered for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.507 of 2022 on the file of the Theppakulam Police Station, Madurai City. It is submitted that the Petitioner is in judicial custody from 30.09.2022 and he is lodged in Central Prison, Madurai.

¶16

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that it is a case in counter and the petitioner is not having any previous cases; that a bail petition is pending before the lower Court; and that, he verified as to the death of the mother of the petitioner and it is found to be gennuine.

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/2

¶19

CRL OP(MD).No.17956 of 2022

¶20

3.Heard both sides and perused the records. A copy of the death certificate issued by the Doctor, Surya Hospital, Madurai with regard to the death of the petitioner's mother, is also produced along with the petition. Considering the above circumstances, to facilitate the petitioner to perform the last rites of his mother Late K.K.Nirmala, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner may be granted bail. There is no order with regard to sureties. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail.

¶21

sd/05/10/2022 / TRUE COPY / /10/2022

¶22

Assistant Registrar (V.O)

¶23

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶24

¶25

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1, MADURAI.

¶26

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

¶27

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THEPPAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶28

4 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI.

¶29

5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶30

+1 CC to M/S.K.SATHISH KUMAR, Advocate (SR-10920[I] dated 05.10.2022)

¶31

vsd

¶32

RS/AM/SAR(06.10.2022) 2P-7C

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

2/2

K.K. Karthick Kumar @ Karthick v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.K. Karthick Kumar @ Karthick v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Shantha Vs Gowri

Dakshinamurthi - Died Vs Vasantha

Lakshmi Vs v.M.Murugan@Murugesan(Died)

K.K. Saravanan Vs The Inspector of Police

Karuppasamy Vs The Inspector of Police

Pandi Vs The Inspector of Police