Lakshmi v. v.M.Murugan@Murugesan(Died)
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petitioner sought withdrawal of W.P.No.35140 of 2019. Court accepted the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No costs awarded.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. No costs awarded.
What the court decided
W.P.No.35140 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.10.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.35140 of 2019
Doosan Employees Union Rep.by its General Secretary, Regn.No.512/TVR No.42, Anjaneyar Koil Street, Poonamallee Chennai – 600 056. ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary, Labour and Employment Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.
- 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation)-2,
Kuralagam, Chennai – 600 108.
3.The Management, Doosan Power Systems India Private Limited, Rep.by its Division Head, No.18/2A, Seneerkuppam By-pass Road Poonamallee, Chennai – 600 056. ..Respondents
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Doosan Employees Union Rep.by its General Secretary
- respondent
Government of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation)-2
- respondent
The Management, Doosan Power Systems India Private Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court