Allowed

Selvaraj v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC22 Sept 2022CRL OP(MD)/16938/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the Madras High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of offences including human bomb threat and obscene video propagation. The judgment allowed the petition despite the gravity of charges due to failure to file charge sheets.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail executing a bond for ₹10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of daily police reporting and non-tampering with evidence.

Selvaraj Vs The Inspector of Police — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.16938 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 22/09/2022

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.16938 of 2022

¶8

Selvaraj

¶9

... Petitioner/Sole Accused

¶10

Vs.

¶11

The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, K K Nagar Police Station, Trichy City, Trichy District. (Crime No.822/2022) ... Respondent/Complainant

¶12

For Petitioner : M/s.Ananda Kumar.N, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶13

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

¶14

PRAYER :-For Bail in Crime No.822 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police.

¶15

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioner/sole accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.07.2022 for the offences punishable under Section 292, 505(1)(a), 507 of IPC and Sections 66F, 67, 67A of Information of Technology Act, in Crime No.822 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶17

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has sent a message to the police control room stating that "he is a human bomb and he propose to explode the Railway Station, Trichy" and has sent an obscene video. Hence the complaint.

¶18

3.On the side of the petitioner, it is stated that the petitioner has completed only 5th standard. He is only an agriculturist. His wife and family members are beaten up by the village president. Only due to frustration, the petitioner created an ID in the name of the Village President namely Devarajan and sent a message to the police. He is in custody for the past 57 days and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis prayed the petitioner to be released on bail.

¶19

1/3

¶20

CRL OP(MD). No.16938 of 2022

¶21

On the side of the prosecution, it is stated that the petitioner purchased a SIM Card in the name of Devarajan and inserted the SIM Card in his cell phone and sent a message to the police control room as 'he is a human bomb and he propose to explode the Railway Station, Trichy, along with an obscene video. He has done this with a motive to create a case against the said Devarajan.

¶22

This is the second bail application before this Court and the earlier bail application was dismissed by this Court, on 06.09.2022, in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16016 of 2022. Though the nature of the offence is grievous, even after 57 days, the police were not able to file a charge sheet. The respondent police is the defacto complainant, even then, they are reluctant to file the charge sheet so far. In the above circumstances, this Court is inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

¶23

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, on his executing a bond for a sum of 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruchirappalli, and on further conditions that:

¶24

(i)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶25

(ii)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

¶26

(iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness;

¶27

(iv)the petitioner shall be present before the Court on hearing dates and before the respondent police as and when required;

¶28

(v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶29

(vi)If the accused / petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶30

/ TRUE COPY /

¶31

22/09/2022

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶34

2/3

¶35

CRL OP(MD). No.16938 of 2022

¶36

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶37

¶38

1 THE JUDIICAL MAGISTRATE NO.II TIRUCHIRAPPALLI

¶39

2 DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,

¶40

TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶41

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY.

¶42

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE K K NAGAR POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY, TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶43

5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶44

+1 CC to M/s.M/S.ANANDA KUMAR.N, Advocate ( SR-10383[I] dated 22/09/2022 )

¶45

¶46

MK/SBN/SAR.IV/22.09.2022/3P/7C

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

3/3

Selvaraj v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Selvaraj v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Vs Devi

M/S.Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Vs Valliyammal

The Branch Manager Vs Thayammal (Died)

Vijaya, W/O.Palanichamy, Vs the Branch Manager

S.R. Ravindran, Vs The Tamilnadu Principal Revenue Controller cum Inspector General of Registration

Vasanthakumar Vs The Inspector of Police