The petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. During the hearing, the counsel applied for and obtained permission to withdraw the Criminal Original Petition, which was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.9987 of 2022
N.ELUMALAI [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ]
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUNAVALUR POLICE STATION, ULUNDHURPET TALUK, KALLAKURICHI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2022)
For Petitioner : M/S.R.THANJAN Advocate
For Respondent : MR. S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.
-sd/-
28/04/2022
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.R.THANJAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.9987/2022
Date :28/04/2022 RVR 06/05/2022
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.ELUMALAI
THE STATE
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUNAVALUR POLICE STATION, ULUNDHURPET TALUK, KALLAKURICHI DISTRICT
G. JAYACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
