M.Kanmani v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners facing charges of obscene acts, mischief, and criminal intimidation in a family dispute case, imposing standard conditions and a fresh FIR provision for absconding.
What did the court decide?
Grant anticipatory bail on conditions including deposit of Rs.10,000 and execution of bond for Rs.50,000 with two sureties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.9818 of 2022
1 M.KANMANI [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 SURYA
Vs
STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNNATHUR POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.70/2022)
For Petitioner : M/S.R.VIGNESHWARI, Advocate for
M/S M.GURUPRASAD Advocate
For Respondent : MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners apprehending arrest for alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 427, and 506(ii) of IPC arising from a family dispute.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Kanmani
- petitioner
Surya
- respondent
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court