M/S Searock Container Terminal v. the State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding Section 403 and 406 IPC offences. Court found the underlying complaint closed via quarterly enquiry; hence, no case is pending. This petition was closed without grant or refusal of bail.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail not decided; petition closed as no case was pending against the petitioner.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twenty Fifth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.9405 of 2022
M/S SEAROCK CONTAINER TERMINAL [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] REP BY ITS, PROPRIETOR MR.A.BALANATHAM
Vs
THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAINJUR POLICE STATON, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2022.
For Petitioner : M/S.R.RAMESH Advocate
For Respondent : MR. S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/S SEAROCK CONTAINER TERMINAL
- respondent
THE STATE
Coram
G. JAYACHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court