Dismissed

Sundara Pandiaya Raja v. State Rep by

Madras HC25 Apr 2022CRL OP/8566/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court refused relief because the petitioner was absconding and investigation had already been completed by the police in his absence despite earlier dismissal of similar pleas.

What did the court decide?

Petition for anticipatory bail dismissed; petitioner directed to surrender before Court below.

Sundara Pandiaya Raja Vs State Rep by — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Twenty Fifth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.8566 of 2022

¶7

¶8

C.C.NO.3974/2021

¶9

(On the file of 17^th Metropolitan Magistrate at Saidapet, Chennai)

¶10

SUNDARA PANDIAYA RAJA [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶11

¶12

STATE REP BY, [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R-1 MAMBALAM POLICE STATION, CHENNAI. (CRIME NO.700/2019)

¶13

For Petitioner : M/S L.INFANT DINESH Advocate

¶14

For Respondent : MR. S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶15

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶16

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶17

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 294(b), 384, 506(i) r/w 34 of IPC in Crime No.700 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

¶18

This is a case where the petitioner is absconding and inspite of earlier dismissal of anticipatory bail by this Court, the respondent police has not secured the accused and in his absence investigation has been completed and absconding charge sheet also filed. In the said circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, it is open to the petitioner to surrender before the Court below and seek for appropriate remedy.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

¶21

-sd/-

¶22

25/04/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶24

¶25

1 THE 17TH METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE SAIDAPET, CHENNAI 2 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R-1 MAMBALAM POLICE STATION, CHENNAI. 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶26

CC to M/S L.INFANT DINESH Advocate on payment of necessary charges Sr.6264

¶27

RVR 29/04/2022

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sundara Pandiaya Raja v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sundara Pandiaya Raja v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murugan @ Velu Vs Station House Officer

Arumugam Vs Sub Inspector of Police

Joy Thomas T.A. Vs Shri. Shankar Jiwal, IPS

Mohammed Faisal Vs State Represented by

M/S Searock Container Terminal Vs the State Rep by

R.Pugazhendhi Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep by