Vel @ Velu v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed Criminal Original Petition No.8325 of 2022 filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail as it was withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
dismissal of the criminal original petition on the ground that it was withdrawn by the petitioner.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Nineteenth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.8325 of 2022
VEL @ VELU [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BARUR POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT. (CR.NO. 20/2022)
For Petitioner : M/S. A.RAMESH Advocate
For Respondent : MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
VEL @ VELU
- respondent
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BARUR POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT
Coram
G. JAYACHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court