V.P.Krishnasamee v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
In an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the High Court granted bail noting the criminal matter had acquired a civil colour due to a pending mortgage recovery suit.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail on condition of executing a bond with sureties, daily reporting to police, and not tampering with evidence or absconding.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Seventh day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.7909 of 2022
V.P.KRISHNASAMEE [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BALUCHETTY CHATHIRAM POLICE STATION, BALUCHETTY CHATHIRAM, KANCHEEPURAM.
(*)CRIME NO.244/2019
For Petitioner : M/S. R.DHANASEKAR Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
For Intervener : M/S.D.DAYALAN, Advocate
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail where a criminal complaint with civil colour was filed regarding a mortgage dispute.
Whether the allegations of transfer of title are frivolous given the pendency of a civil suit based on the same mortgage deed.
What conditions should be imposed for the grant of anticipatory bail in this case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.P.KRISHNASAMEE
- respondent
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BALUCHETTY CHATHIRAM
Coram
G. JAYACHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court