Dismissed

M.Kolanji v. the State Rep.by

Madras HC7 Apr 2022CRL OP/2864/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed a petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur. Finding no breach of bail conditions and noting the closure of the relevant complained report, the court held there was no necessity to interfere with the order below.

What did the court decide?

Petition to cancel anticipatory bail is dismissed as there is no breach of bail conditions.

M.Kolanji Vs the State Rep.by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.04.2022

¶2

CORAM:

¶3

THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶4

Crl.O.P.No.2864 of 2022

¶5

M.Kolanji ...Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Kaikalathur Police Station, Veppanthattia Taluk Perambalur District. ..Respondent/Complainant

¶8

2.Angamuthu 3.Ramar 4.Saritha

¶9

5.Kaviyarasan

¶10

6.Kalaimani 7.Sumathi ...Respondents/Accused

¶11

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 439 (2) of Cr.P.C praying to cancel the anticipatory bail dated 07.01.2022 passed in Crl.MP.No.28 of 2022 by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur in Crime No.258 of 2021 on the file of the first respondent police.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganesan For 1^st Respondent: Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl. Side) R2 to R7 : No Appearance

¶13

ORDER

¶14

The petitioner filed this petition to cancel anticipatory bail granted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur, dated 07.01.2022, on the ground that after obtaining anticipatory bail, the accused threatened the defacto complainant and CSR registered.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) has filed a counter wherein, it is stated that the petitioner herein has given a complaint against the accused in Crime No.258 of 2021 in CSR.No.10 of 2022. However, after enquiry, CSR was closed and advising the party to approach the Revenue Officials to settle the property dispute.

¶17

3.Taking note of the fact, this Court finds that there is no necessity for this Court to interfere with the anticipatory bail granted by the trial Court. Since this Court finds no breach of the bail condition, this petition is dismissed.

s/d-

Assistant Registrar

True Copy

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶22

Vv/pbl

¶23

¶24

The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Perambalur,

¶25

The Inspector of Police, Kaikalathur Police Station, Veppanthattia Taluk Perambalur District.

¶26

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶27

Crl.OP.No.2864 of 2022

¶28

GPL(CO)

¶29

SP(28/04/2022)

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Kolanji v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Kolanji v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kalaimani Vs State Rep.by

S.Meganathan Vs the State Rep by

Ramu @ Ramanathan Vs State Rep.by

V.P.Krishnasamee Vs State Rep by

Mushtaq Ahamad Banday Vs the State, Represented by

R.Sundaresan Vs a.Nandaa Kumar