Dismissed

Dr.Prasanna v. Raja Subashini

Madras HC9 Feb 2022CRL OP/5006/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court permitted the withdrawal of a criminal original petition filed to quash proceedings. The Court directed the petitioners to pay Rs. 25,000 as costs to the respondent and ordered the lower court to conclude the matter within three months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners permitted to withdraw the petition; costs of Rs. 25,000 imposed; lower court directed to dispose of M.C.No.19 of 2014 within three months.

Dr.Prasanna Vs Raja Subashini — Maintenance and Alimony | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 09.02.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.5006 of 2016

¶6

and

¶7

Crl.M.P.Nos.2624 & 2625 of 2016

¶8

1.Dr. Prasanna 2.R. Kuzhalvanan 3.Kalpana 4.K. Deepa 5.C. Pandian 6.K. Vinoya ... Petitioners/ Respondents

¶9

Vs.

¶10

Raja Subashini ... Respondent / Complainant

¶11

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in M.C.No.19 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate-cumAdditional Mahila Court, (Magistrate Level), Cuddalore and quash the same.

¶12

For Petitioners: Mr. S. Sadasharam

¶13

For Respondent : Mr. R. Karthikeyan

¶14

ORDER

¶15

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the Crl.O.P.No.5006/2016.

¶16

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent opposed the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners on the ground that there is a direction passed by this Court on 08.12.2021 "directing the petitioners to pay the entire arrears of maintenance ordered by this Court on 29.11.2016 on or before 21.12.2021".

¶17

In reply, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the order dated 29.11.2016 was passed in stay petition and if the order is not complied, the only option is to vacate the stay. Therefore, he reiterated the request for

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

withdrawl of this criminal original petition.

¶20

When the learned counsel for the petitioners chose to withdraw the Crl.O.P, this Court has no option except to accept his request, unless there are grounds to reject the request. This criminal original petition was filed in 2016 and it is pending till 2021 with an order of stay. Because of pendency of this Crl.O.P., proceedings before the trial Court is also pending.

¶21

Now the petitioners have chosen to withdraw the petition. Therefore, this Court directs the petitioners to pay the costs of Rs.25,000/- to the respondent within a period of one month from today. Petitioners are permitted to withdraw this petition. The learned Mahila Court Judge is directed to dispose of the M.C.No.19 of 2014, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶22

6. With the above direction, this criminal original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(CS-II)

¶25

//True Copy//

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

¶28

¶29

1.The Judicial Magistrate-cum-Additional Mahila Court, (Magistrate Level), Cuddalore.

¶30

2.Do Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Cuddalore.

¶31

+1cc to Mr.R.Karthikeyan, Advocate, S.R.No.8169 +1cc to Mr.S.Sadasharam, Advocate, S.R.No.8172

¶32

Crl.O.P.No.5006 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.Nos.2624 & 2625 of 2016

¶33

KG(CO) SB(23/02/2022)

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dr.Prasanna v. Raja Subashini

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.Prasanna v. Raja Subashini

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.M.K.Subbulakshmi Vs Kalaiselvi

V.Arumugam Vs State Rep by

R.Murugan Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police

A.P.Velusamy Vs the Inspector of Police

G.Gowri Vs N.Rupla

D.Thiyagarajan Vs M.P.Murugesan