Allowed

Ranjith Kumar v. the Sttae Rep by

Madras HC25 Jan 2022CRL OP/283/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras granted bail to petitioners arrested under the NDPS Act. The order imposed a condition of a non-refundable deposit of Rs.20,000 each to the Cancer Institute, alongside execution of sureties and reporting requirements.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioners on bail upon deposit of Rs.20,000 each as non-refundable charity, execution of sureties for Rs.10,000 each, and compliance with reporting conditions.

Ranjith Kumar Vs the Sttae Rep by — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.01.2022

¶2

CORAM:

¶3

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

¶4

Crl.O.P.No.283 of 2022

¶5

Ranjithkumar 2. Prabhakaran ..Petitioners

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The State Rep. By Inspector of Police, NIB-CID, Chennai. (Crime No.27 of 2021) ... Respondent

¶8

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail, pending investigation in Crime No.27 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.

¶9

For Petitioners : M/s.R.Sankarasubbu

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan (Additional Public Prosecutor)

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.09.2021 for the offences under Sections 8(C) with 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29(1) of NDPS Act, in Crime No.27 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶13

The case of the prosecution is that on the date of occurrence, the petitioners were found in illegal possession of 28 kgs of Ganja. Hence, the complaint.

¶14

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case and that they have been suffering incarceration for the past 130 days from 18.09.2021. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioners.

¶15

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would raise strong objection stating that the petitioners were found in illegal possession of 28 kgs of Ganja. He further submits that there is no previous case pending against these petitioners and the investigation was almost completed.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners shall be directed to make a non refundable deposit of Rs.20,000/(each) (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only), to the credit of Cancer Institute (WIA) (Regional Cancer Centre), Adyar, Chennai – 600020, bearing A/c.No.149710011005477, Andhra Bank, Madhya Kailash Branch, without prejudice to their rights and contentions. The amount so deposited shall be utilised by the said Cancer Institute for the treating the patients.

¶18

It is made clear that the deposit of the amount by the petitioners to the said Institute would not amount to admission of guilt. The trial Court shall deal with the case independently on merits without reference to the amount deposited at the stage of bail.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the investigation is completed and there is no previous case against the petitioners and also considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶20

(a) the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/- each (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) as non-refundable deposit through RTGS/NEFT/Demand Draft in favour of the Cancer Institute (WIA) (Regional Cancer Centre), Adyar, Chennai – 600020, bearing A/c.No.149710011005477, Andhra Bank, Madhya Kailash Branch. On proof of such deposit, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on executing their own bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- each (Rupees Ten Thousand only), before the Superintendent of the concerned prison, in which the petitioners have been confined and thereafter on their release;

¶21

(b) the petitioners shall execute two sureties for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), before the Special Court for NDPS Cases, Chennai, within 15 days from the date of commencement of the Court’s normal functioning, failing which the bail granted by this Court shall stand dismissed automatically;

¶22

(c) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶23

(d) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police on every Tuesday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶24

(e) the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar nature;

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

(f) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶27

(g) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶28

(h) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

¶29

(i) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶30

-sd/-

¶31

25/01/2022

¶32

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶33

TRUE COPY

¶34

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶35

¶36

1 THE SPECIALCOURT FOR NDPS CASES, CHENNAI

¶37

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶38

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NIB CID, CHENNAI

¶39

4 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL, CHENNAI

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

5 THE CANCER INSTITUTE (WIA) (REGIONAL CANCER CENTRE), ADYAR, CHENNAI – 600020, BEARING A/C.NO.149710011005477, ANDHRA BANK, MADHYA KAILASH BRANCH.

¶42

+2 CC to M/S.R.SANKARASUBBU Advocate on payment of necessary charges Sr.1154

¶43

CRL OP.283/2022

¶44

Date :25/01/2022 RVR 27/01/2022

¶45

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ranjith Kumar v. the Sttae Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjith Kumar v. the Sttae Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagaraj Vs The Inspector of Police

Ramadas Vs the State Rep by

Chitra Vs State Rep by

K.Rajiv Gandhi Vs State Rep by

Venkatasivanaga Kumar Vs State Rep by

Manikandan Vs the State Repby