Allowed

Dineshkumar v. State Rep by

Madras HC1 Apr 2022CRL OP/6152/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras granted bail to three petitioners charged withIPC 147, 148, 294(b), 323, and 307 in a love-affair related attack. Considering the victim was discharged and the prime accused secured, bail was granted subject to bond, reporting, and no-tampering conditions. One petitioner was directed to stay in Salem; others in Erode.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail conditioned to execute a bond of Rs.50,000 with sureties, stay in specific districts, report to police daily, and not tamper with evidence or witnesses.

Dineshkumar Vs State Rep by — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.04.2022

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.Nos.6152 & 6189 of 2022

¶6

1.Dineshkumar 2.Venkatesh ... Petitioners in Crl.O.P.No.6152 of 2022 Vikramathithan ... Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.6189 of 2022

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Belukurichi Police Station, Namakkal District. (Crime No.14 of 2022) ... Respondent in both the Crl.O.P's

¶9

COMMON PRAYER: Criminal Original Petitions has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No.14 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police.

¶10

For Petitioners in both the Crl.O.Ps : Mr.W.Camyles Gandhi

¶11

For Respondent in both the Crl.O.Ps : Ms.G.V.Kasthuri Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

COMMON ORDER

¶13

The petitioners/A3, A4 and A5, who were arrested for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323 & 307 of IPC in Crime No.14 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.

¶14

2.Due to the love affair, the son of the defacto complainant was attacked by these petitioners and others causing grievous injury. They were arrested on 14.02.2022. The injured victim was discharged from the hospital after taking treatment for mastoid depressed fracture and comminuted fracture on frontal cerebral convexity.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

3.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent submits that the injured victim is discharged from the hospital and the investigation is almost completed.

¶17

4.Considering the said fact and the prime accused, who was absconding has also been secured, this court is of the view that the petitioners may be granted bail subject to certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail subject to the following conditions;

¶18

(a) Each of the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Senthamangalam.

¶19

(b) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶20

(c) the petitioners in Crl.O.P.6152 of 2022 are directed to stay at Erode District and report before Pallipalayam Police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶21

(d) the petitioner in Crl.O.P.6189 of 2022 is directed to stay at Salem District and report before Fairland Police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶22

(e) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶23

(f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

(g) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶26

-sd/01/04/2022

¶27

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶28

TRUE COPY

¶29

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶30

¶31

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SENTHAMANGALAM.

¶32

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NAMAKKAL [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BELUKURICHI POLICE STATION, NAMAKKAL DISTRICT.

¶33

4 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, SALEM. 5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶34

6 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, / STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PALLIPALAYAM POLICE STATION, ERODE DISTRICT.

¶35

7 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, / STATION HOUSE OFFICER, FAIRLAND POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.

¶36

+2 CC to M/S. W.CAMYLES GANDHI Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.Nos.4746 & 4945

¶37

CRL OP.6152 & 6189/2022 Date :01/04/2022 JPA 04/04/2022

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dineshkumar v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dineshkumar v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Asir Manova Jebamani Vs State by the Inspector of Police

R.Ganesan @ Rama Ganesan Vs State Rep by Inspector of Police

Praveen Vs State Rep by

Veerakumar Vs State Rep by

S.Karthikeyan Vs the State Rep by

Ramesh Vs the Sub Inspector of Police