Aravind v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The court allowed a petition for leave to continue a criminal appeal (Crl.A.No.93 of 2018) by the petitioner, who is the son of the deceased appellant, deceased pending the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Leave granted to the petitioner to continue Criminal Appeal No. 93 of 2018.
What the court decided
Crl.MP.No.4070 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.93 of 2018
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J.,
This petition is filed for granting leave to the petitioner to continue Crl.A.No.93 of 2018.
2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant Mrs.B.Nirmala died on 06.05.2021 and her husband also died on 28.02.2021. The petitioner herein is the son of the deceased appellant Mrs.B.Nirmala. It is submitted that the deceased has got a good case on merits and therefore, the appeal has to be continued by the petitioner herein.
3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor also submitted that the appellant died on 06.05.2021 and the petitioner herein is her son.
4.In view of the fact that the appellant is dead pending appeal, her son/legal heir Aravind wants to continue the appeal and prays this Court to allow this petition granting leave to continue the appeal by the petitioner herein, this petition is allowed.
sli 08.04.2022
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the son of a deceased appellant is entitled to obtain leave to continue the criminal appeal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Aravind
- appellant
Mrs. B. Nirmala's Legal Heir
Coram
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court