17.In the case before hand, learned counsel for the petitioner produced copy of the entry pass issued by the staff of the Registry that he visited this Court at 2 p.m. On 03.11.2014. This entry pass, prima facie, shows that petitioner visited this Court at 2 p.m. On 03.11.2014 to meet his counsel at chamber number 20. When that be the case, a complaint given in C.C.No.46 of 2015 that on 03.11.2014, petitioner abused the defacto complainant Madhamma, criminally intimidated her, could not have been true. After committing the offence at 10 a.m. on 03.11.2014, it was not possible for the petitioner to come to this Court at 2 p.m. on the same date. In the manner in which, the complaints in C.C.No.44 of 2015, C.C.No.45 of 2015 and C.C.No.46 of 2015 had been generated with identical allegations; the fact that eye witnesses in all these cases almost the same persons and defacto complainant in other cases; that they are interested witnesses; that none of the defacto complainant had taken medical treatment and that the allegations made in the complaints can be made by anyone against anybody. The allegations made in the complaints and statement of witnesses are absurd and inherently impossible. No person with ordinary prudence will believe the allegations. Thus, this Court is of the considered view that there is every possibility that the complaints in C.C.No.44 of 2015, C.C.No.45 of 2015 and C.C.No.46 of 2015 had been given falsely against the petitioner at the instance of Suresh Babu. It is true that allegationsl of malafide is not the only ground for quashing the complaints/final reports. In the case before hand, for the reasons afore said, this Court finds that the complaints in C.C.No.44 of 2015, C.C.No.45 of 2015 and C.C.No.46 of 2015 had been given falsely against the petitioner only to harass him with criminal prosecutions. A case can be quashed to prevent the abuse process of any Court and to secure the ends of justice. In this view of the matter, this Court finds that the cases in C.C.No.44 of 2015, C.C.No.45 of 2015 and C.C.No.46 of 2015 are liable to be quashed and accordingly quashed.
