Allowed

Tamilarasan v. the State Rep by

Madras HC12 Jan 2022CRL MP/231/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed by accused persons to relax conditions of bail reporting. The court allowed the relaxation of conditions requiring the petitioners to stay at Dharmapuri and report every Tuesday and Sunday.

What did the court decide?

The condition already imposed by this Court was relaxed; the petitioners are no longer required to stay at Dharmapuri and report to the B-1 Town Police Station on every Tuesday and Sunday.

Tamilarasan Vs the State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twelfth day of January Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.231 of 2022 IN CRL OP.23994/2021

¶5

1 TAMILARASAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 MOORTHY 3 SENTHIL KUMAR

¶6

¶7

THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVERKADU POLICE STATION, AMBATTUR DISTRICT. CR NO.1459/2021

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner to stay at Dharmapuri and report before the B-1 Town Police Station, Dharmapuri on every Tuesday and Sunday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders, by an order dated 09.12.2021 passed in Crl.OP.No. 23994 of 2021 and thus render justice.

¶9

Order: This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.D.RAJAKUMAR, Advocate for the Petitioner and of MR.A.GOKULAKRISHNAN Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶10

Heard both sides.

¶11

This petition is filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P.No. 23994 of 2021, dated 19.12.2021.

¶12

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners are complying with the conditions regularly.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

Considering the said submission, the condition already imposed by this Court is relaxed.

¶15

-sd/-

¶16

12/01/2022

¶17

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶18

TRUE COPY

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶20

¶21

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, POONAMALLEE. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT (FOR INFORMATION). 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVERKADU POLICE STATION, AMBATTUR DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS. 5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE/ STATION HOUSE OFFICER, B-1, TOWN POLICE STATION, DHARMAPURI. C.C. to M/S.D.RAJAKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges Order in CRL MP.231/2022 in CRL OP.23994/2021 Date :12/01/2022 From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶22

INBA~28/01/2022

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tamilarasan v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamilarasan v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Pandiyan Vs the State Rep.by

B.Vengatapathi Vs the State Rep by

Gandhimathi Vs State Rep by

Vasudevan Vs the State Rep.by

Logesh Vs State Rep by

R.Sanjai Vs State Rep by